Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB: Comparison
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB: the cas latency difference
On cas latency the spread is 45%, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB 32, so ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ takes it. Add true latency to that, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB, and the pattern holds. Peak bandwidth runs the same way, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 51.2 GB/s on the Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB, another win for Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB. Ddr generation is not the same on both, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB. Form factor is not the same on both, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB. Platform optimisation is not the same on both, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Both on the Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB.
Which should you buy, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB?
The Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB is the one to take for higher-speed DDR5 desktop upgrades, though it is not the pick for systems limited to lower DDR5 speeds and builders needing a matched dual-channel kit. The same goes for AM5 or Intel builds wanting a fast but still well-supported speed.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, capacity per module and module count included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- 8.8/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- Goodram
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- IR-6400D564L32S/16G
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- 32-45%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- 1
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- Both
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-50%
- Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB
- 51.2 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 32) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose Goodram IR-6400D564L32S/16G 16GB if you want the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).