Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK: Comparison
What is the difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK?
Start with true latency, because it is the widest measured gap between them: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 13.8 ns against G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK 9.0 ns, 53% in favour of G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK. Add cas latency to that, 22 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 18 on the G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK, and the pattern holds. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 64.0 GB/s on the G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK, and the pattern holds. Module count is not the same on both, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR4 on the G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK. They differ on form factor too, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 288-Pin DIMM on the G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK.
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK: which one fits your build
it is not the pick for RGB-focused builds; Ripjaws V ships without lighting. It also earns its place with DDR4 builds chasing the highest frequency Ripjaws V offers, ahead of a move to DDR5. Avoid it for new 2026 builds; DDR5 is the better long-term platform at this point.
What ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK have in common
Everything else lines up. Capacity per module, ddr generation and warranty read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- 9.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- DDR4
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- G.Skill
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- F4-4000C18D-32GVK
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- Ripjaws V
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22-22%
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- 18Best
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- Desktop DDR4
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- 288-Pin DIMM
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-53%
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- 9.0 nsBest
Warranty
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Limited Lifetime
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- Limited Lifetime
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-60%
- G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK
- 64.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK if you want the lower CAS latency (18 vs 22), the lower true latency (9.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (64.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ | G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-4000C18D-32GVK |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.