Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8: Comparison
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8 separate most on capacity per module: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 16 GB, Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8 at 8 GB, 50% in favor of ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. CAS Latency splits them by another 47%, this time favoring Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8. They match on ddr generation, module count and warranty.
Pick the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if that matters to you: 2x the capacity per module (16 GB vs 8 GB), which is what keeps browser tabs, games and editing apps from spilling to the SSD. Pick the Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8 if that matters to you: 18% lower true latency (11.3 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen. Both kits must match your motherboard's memory generation.
Which is better, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8?
On paper, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ has the edge on capacity per module, at 16 GB vs Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8 at 8 GB.
What is the main difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8?
The ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8 are built for different jobs. The ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ has 2x the capacity per module (16 GB vs 8 GB), which is what keeps browser tabs, games and editing apps from spilling to the SSD. The Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8 has 18% lower true latency (11.3 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen.
Specs and benchmarks
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- DDR4
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- Kingston
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- KF426S15IB/8
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- FURY Impact
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22-47%
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- 15Best
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- Laptop SODIMM
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- 1
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- 260-Pin SODIMM (Laptop)
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GBBest
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- 8 GB-50%
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-22%
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- 11.3 nsBest
Warranty
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Limited Lifetime
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- Limited Lifetime
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/sBest
- Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
- 21.3 GB/s-17%
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 8 GB) and the higher peak bandwidth (25.6 GB/s vs 21.3 GB/s).
Choose Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8 if you want the lower CAS latency (15 vs 22) and the lower true latency (11.3 ns vs 13.8 ns).
Verdict
Kingston FURY Impact KF426S15IB/8
7.5 / 10 Expert Rating
A sensible, low-cost match for older laptops whose memory controllers can't exceed 2666MHz anyway.
More comparisons in RAM
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Vengeance CMK16GX5M2B5200Z40
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Adata Ao2v48uc8w1 Bhls 8GB
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs OWC 32GB DDR5-4800 ECC UDIMM
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs PNY Performance MN16GSD42666




