Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 vs FriendlyElec NanoPi M4: Comparison

What is the difference between BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 and FriendlyElec NanoPi M4?

The first real difference is onboard storage: BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 16GB eMMC, microSD against FriendlyElec NanoPi M4 microSD slot; eMMC socket. sbc-bench: 7-Zip MIPS, multi-threaded (MIPS), sbc-bench run backs the spec sheet up. FriendlyElec NanoPi M4 scores 6,400 to 3,470, 46% clear. They differ on soc model too, TI TDA4VM, Dual-Core Cortex-A72 @ 2.0GHz + C7x DSP... on the BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 versus Hexa-core on the FriendlyElec NanoPi M4. Connectivity is not the same on both, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 , M.2 E-key PCIe on the BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 versus Dual-band WiFi, Bluetooth on the FriendlyElec NanoPi M4.

Which should you buy, BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 or FriendlyElec NanoPi M4?

Take the BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 for industrial robotics, drone, and real-time computer vision projects needing heterogeneous compute and guaranteed low-latency sensor processing. It is the wrong buy for general-purpose computing, media centers, or hobbyist projects, this board's specialized architecture is wasted outside vision/robotics workloads. Buy the FriendlyElec NanoPi M4 for budget buyers who want proven, long-available RK3399-class performance. It is not the one for buyers who want a built-in NPU or the newest available silicon. Our rating of the BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 (7/10): A purpose-built heterogeneous compute board for industrial robotics and vision work, wasted on anything general-purpose. Our rating of the FriendlyElec NanoPi M4 (7/10): proven, long-available RK3399 performance at a budget price, minus an NPU.

FriendlyElec NanoPi M4 (Single-Board Computer/Rockchip RK3399/Hexa-Core Cortex-A72+A53/Up to 4GB LPDDR3)
FriendlyElec

$50.00

Consumercarts listing

@ Consumercarts listing ›

Specs and benchmarks

  • Brand

    BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64
    BeagleBoard.org
    FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
    FriendlyElec
  • SoC Model

    BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64
    TI TDA4VM, Dual-Core Cortex-A72 @ 2.0GHz + C7x DSP + 6x Cortex-R5F + 2x C66x DSP
    FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
    Hexa-core (Dual Cortex-A72 + Quad Cortex-A53)
  • Onboard Storage

    BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64
    16GB eMMC, microSD
    FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
    microSD slot; eMMC socket (no onboard eMMC)
  • Connectivity

    BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64
    Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 (Type-C + 2x Type-A), M.2 E-key PCIe (WiFi)
    FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
    Dual-band WiFi, Bluetooth

Benchmarks

  • Other Published Benchmarks
  • sbc-bench: 7-Zip MIPS, multi-threaded (MIPS), sbc-bench run

    BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64
    3,470-46%
    FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
    6,400Best

    sbc-bench Results (Thomas Kaiser), retrieved 23 Sept 2026. Higher is better.

    Compression, encryption and memory tests. Small gaps can come from software, not hardware.

  • sbc-bench: 7-Zip MIPS, single-threaded (MIPS), sbc-bench run

    BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64
    1,872Best
    FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
    1,835-2%

    sbc-bench Results (Thomas Kaiser), retrieved 23 Sept 2026. Higher is better.

    Compression, encryption and memory tests. Small gaps can come from software, not hardware.

  • sbc-bench: OpenSSL AES-256-CBC, single thread (KB/s), sbc-bench run

    BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64
    1,130,390Best
    FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
    1,128,3300%

    sbc-bench Results (Thomas Kaiser), retrieved 23 Sept 2026. Higher is better.

    Compression, encryption and memory tests. Small gaps can come from software, not hardware.

  • sbc-bench: Memory copy bandwidth (tinymembench memcpy) (MB/s), sbc-bench run

    BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64
    2,660-35%
    FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
    4,080Best

    sbc-bench Results (Thomas Kaiser), retrieved 23 Sept 2026. Higher is better.

    Compression, encryption and memory tests. Small gaps can come from software, not hardware.

sbc-bench by Thomas Kaiser (github.com/ThomasKaiser/sbc-bench, Results.md). Copyright (c) 2018, Thomas Kaiser. All rights reserved. Redistributed under the BSD 3-Clause License; full notice, conditions and disclaimer: github.com/ThomasKaiser/sbc-bench/blob/master/LICENSE

Which one should you pick?

Choose BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64 if you want the higher sbc-bench: 7-Zip MIPS, single-threaded (MIPS), sbc-bench run (1,872 vs 1,835) and the higher sbc-bench: OpenSSL AES-256-CBC, single thread (KB/s), sbc-bench run (1,130,390 vs 1,128,330).

Choose FriendlyElec NanoPi M4 if you want the higher sbc-bench: 7-Zip MIPS, multi-threaded (MIPS), sbc-bench run (6,400 vs 3,470) and the higher sbc-bench: memory copy bandwidth (tinymembench memcpy) (MB/s), sbc-bench run (4,080 vs 2,660).

Price comparison

RetailerBeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64FriendlyElec NanoPi M4
Consumercarts listing

$50.00

View on Consumercarts listing

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

Verdict

BeagleBoard.org BeagleBone AI-64

7 / 10 Expert Rating

A purpose-built heterogeneous compute board for industrial robotics and vision work, wasted on anything general-purpose.

FriendlyElec NanoPi M4

7 / 10 Expert Rating

Proven, long-available RK3399 performance at a budget price, minus an NPU.

More comparisons in Single-board Computers