Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA100 vs Acer Predator GM9000: Comparison
FA100 vs Predator GM9000: the sequential read difference
Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, FA100 3300 MB/s against Predator GM9000 14000 MB/s, a 76% lead for Predator GM9000. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Predator GM9000 returns 9.7 against 6.4, a 34% lead. Sequential write runs the same way, 2700 MB/s on the FA100 versus 13000 MB/s on the Predator GM9000, another win for Predator GM9000. Add nand layers to that, 64 on the FA100 versus 232 on the Predator GM9000, and the pattern holds. There is a split on bus interface as well, PCIe 3.0 x4 on the FA100 versus PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Predator GM9000. There is a split on dram cache as well, DRAM-less on the FA100 versus DRAM on the Predator GM9000. They differ on controller too, IG5216 on the FA100 versus SM2508 on the Predator GM9000. They differ on controller vendor too, InnoGrit on the FA100 versus Silicon Motion on the Predator GM9000.
Which should you buy, FA100 or Predator GM9000?
Buy the FA100 for everyday laptops and desktops with a PCIe 3.0 M.2 slot. It also earns its place with budget upgrades needing 2000 GB of NVMe storage in a standard M.2 2280 slot. It is not the one for anyone wanting PCIe 4.0 speeds, since this drive tops out at 3300 MB/s reads.
What FA100 and Predator GM9000 have in common
The common ground is wider than the gap: capacity, nand type, form factor, drive type and nand vendor are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA100
- 6.4/10-34%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 9.7/10Best
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA100
- Acer
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Acer
Model Number
- Acer FA100
- Acer FA100 (Micron B27B)
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Acer Predator GM9000
Series
- Acer FA100
- FA100
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Predator GM9000
Drive Type
- Acer FA100
- Internal
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA100
- PCIe 3.0 x4
- Acer Predator GM9000
- PCIe 5.0 x4
Form Factor
- Acer FA100
- M.2 2280
- Acer Predator GM9000
- M.2 2280
Capacity
- Acer FA100
- 2000 GB
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 2000 GB
Sequential Read
- Acer FA100
- 3300 MB/s-76%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 14000 MB/s
Sequential Write
- Acer FA100
- 2700 MB/s-79%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 13000 MB/s
Controller
- Acer FA100
- IG5216
- Acer Predator GM9000
- SM2508
Controller Vendor
- Acer FA100
- InnoGrit
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Silicon Motion
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA100
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Acer Predator GM9000
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA100
- TLC
- Acer Predator GM9000
- TLC
NAND Vendor
- Acer FA100
- Micron
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Micron
NAND Layers
- Acer FA100
- 64-72%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 232
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA100 if you want the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB).
Choose Acer Predator GM9000 if you want the higher speed score (9.7 vs 6.4), the higher sequential read (14000 MB/s vs 3300 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (13000 MB/s vs 2700 MB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA100 | Acer Predator GM9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.