Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA100 vs Kingston XS2000: Comparison

Acer FA100 vs Kingston XS2000 sequential read compared

Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, Acer FA100 3300 MB/s against Kingston XS2000 2000 MB/s, a 39% lead for Acer FA100. There is a split on bus interface as well, PCIe 3.0 x4 on the Acer FA100 versus USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 on the Kingston XS2000. There is a split on form factor as well, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA100 versus Portable Enclosure on the Kingston XS2000. They differ on drive type too, Internal on the Acer FA100 versus External Portable on the Kingston XS2000.

Which should you buy, Acer FA100 or Kingston XS2000?

Buy the Acer FA100 for everyday laptops and desktops with a PCIe 3.0 M.2 slot. It also earns its place with budget upgrades needing 2000 GB of NVMe storage in a standard M.2 2280 slot. Avoid it for anyone wanting PCIe 4.0 speeds, since this drive tops out at 3300 MB/s reads. Take the Kingston XS2000 for PS5 owners wanting fast, plug-and-play expandable storage. This is specifically confirmed to work directly with the console without complication. It is equally the pick for anyone who wants flagship-tier speed in the smallest, lightest possible physical package. A genuine size-to-performance standout in the category. It is the wrong buy for buyers specifically prioritizing maximum durability or the longest warranty term. The Samsung T9 or T7 Shield, both covered elsewhere on this site, offer stronger protection and warranty backing.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA100
    6.4/10
    Kingston XS2000
    7.5/10

    Internal and portable SSDs are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly.

  • Brand

    Acer FA100
    Acer
    Kingston XS2000
    Kingston
  • Model Number

    Acer FA100
    Acer FA100 (Micron B27B)
    Kingston XS2000
    XS2000
  • Series

    Acer FA100
    FA100
    Kingston XS2000
    Kingston XS2000
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA100
    Internal
    Kingston XS2000
    External Portable
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA100
    PCIe 3.0 x4
    Kingston XS2000
    USB 3.2 Gen 2x2
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA100
    M.2 2280
    Kingston XS2000
    Portable Enclosure
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA100
    3300 MB/s
    Kingston XS2000
    2000 MB/s-39%

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA100 if you want the higher sequential read (3300 MB/s vs 2000 MB/s).

    Choose Kingston XS2000 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA100 with