Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA100 vs Lexar NM790: Comparison

Acer FA100 vs Lexar NM790 sequential read compared

On sequential read the spread is 55%, Acer FA100 3300 MB/s against Lexar NM790 7400 MB/s, so Lexar NM790 takes it. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Lexar NM790 17% ahead, 7.7 against 6.4. Add sequential write to that, 2700 MB/s on the Acer FA100 versus 6500 MB/s on the Lexar NM790, and the pattern holds. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 3.0 x4 on the Acer FA100 versus PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe on the Lexar NM790. There is a split on nand type as well, TLC on the Acer FA100 versus TLC, DRAM-Less with Host Memory Buffer on the Lexar NM790.

Who each one is for

The Acer FA100 is the one to take for everyday laptops and desktops with a PCIe 3.0 M.2 slot. It also earns its place with budget upgrades needing 2000 GB of NVMe storage in a standard M.2 2280 slot. It is not the one for anyone wanting PCIe 4.0 speeds, since this drive tops out at 3300 MB/s reads. The Lexar NM790 suits budget-conscious gaming builds and PS5 storage expansion, though it is not built for sustained heavy write workloads and professional workstation use. Our rating of the Lexar NM790 (8.2/10): one of the best value flagship-speed drives available, though the DRAM-less design trades some sustained-write consistency.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA100
    6.4/10-17%
    Lexar NM790
    7.7/10Best

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA100
    Acer
    Lexar NM790
    Lexar
  • Model Number

    Acer FA100
    Acer FA100 (Micron B27B)
    Lexar NM790
    NM790
  • Series

    Acer FA100
    FA100
    Lexar NM790
    NM790
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA100
    PCIe 3.0 x4
    Lexar NM790
    PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA100
    3300 MB/s-55%
    Lexar NM790
    7400 MB/s
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA100
    2700 MB/s-58%
    Lexar NM790
    6500 MB/s
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA100
    TLC
    Lexar NM790
    TLC, DRAM-Less with Host Memory Buffer

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA100 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Choose Lexar NM790 if you want the higher speed score (7.7 vs 6.4), the higher sequential read (7400 MB/s vs 3300 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6500 MB/s vs 2700 MB/s).

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA100Lexar NM790
    AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Lexar NM790

    8.2 / 10 Expert Rating

    One of the best value flagship-speed drives available, though the DRAM-less design trades some sustained-write consistency.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA100 with