Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA100 vs Samsung 870 QVO: Comparison
Acer FA100 vs Samsung 870 QVO sequential read compared
Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, Acer FA100 3300 MB/s against Samsung 870 QVO 560 MB/s, a 83% lead for Acer FA100. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Acer FA100 returns 6.4 against 3.7, a 42% lead. Samsung 870 QVO also leads on nand layers, 64 on the Acer FA100 versus 96 on the Samsung 870 QVO. They differ on form factor too, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA100 versus 2.5-inch on the Samsung 870 QVO. They differ on controller too, IG5216 on the Acer FA100 versus Samsung MKX on the Samsung 870 QVO. Controller vendor is not the same on both, InnoGrit on the Acer FA100 versus Samsung on the Samsung 870 QVO. They differ on nand vendor too, Micron on the Acer FA100 versus Samsung on the Samsung 870 QVO.
Which should you buy, Acer FA100 or Samsung 870 QVO?
The Acer FA100 is the one to take for everyday laptops and desktops with a PCIe 3.0 M.2 slot. It is equally the pick for budget upgrades needing 2000 GB of NVMe storage in a standard M.2 2280 slot. Avoid it for anyone wanting PCIe 4.0 speeds, since this drive tops out at 3300 MB/s reads. Buy the Samsung 870 QVO for bulk file storage and budget NAS-adjacent SATA use, though it is the wrong buy for OS or boot drives with frequent writes and performance-sensitive workloads. Our rating of the Samsung 870 QVO (7.5/10): the best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.
Frequently asked questions
Do the Acer FA100 and Samsung 870 QVO differ on bus interface?
Yes. Bus Interface reads PCIe 3.0 x4 on the Acer FA100 versus SATA III on the Samsung 870 QVO.
Is the Drive Type the same on the Acer FA100 and Samsung 870 QVO?
It is. Both are listed at Internal, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA100
- 6.4/10Best
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 3.7/10-42%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA100
- Acer
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Samsung
Model Number
- Acer FA100
- Acer FA100 (Micron B27B)
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 870 QVO
Series
- Acer FA100
- FA100
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 870 QVO
Drive Type
- Acer FA100
- Internal
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA100
- PCIe 3.0 x4
- Samsung 870 QVO
- SATA III
Form Factor
- Acer FA100
- M.2 2280
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 2.5-inch
Sequential Read
- Acer FA100
- 3300 MB/s
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 560 MB/s-83%
Controller
- Acer FA100
- IG5216
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Samsung MKX
Controller Vendor
- Acer FA100
- InnoGrit
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Samsung
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA100
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Samsung 870 QVO
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA100
- TLC
- Samsung 870 QVO
- QLC
NAND Vendor
- Acer FA100
- Micron
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Samsung
NAND Layers
- Acer FA100
- 64-33%
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 96
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA100 if you want the higher speed score (6.4 vs 3.7) and the higher sequential read (3300 MB/s vs 560 MB/s).
Choose Samsung 870 QVO if you want the higher NAND layers (96 vs 64).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA100 | Samsung 870 QVO |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Samsung 870 QVO
7.5 / 10 Expert Rating
The best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.