Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA100 vs Acer Predator GM9000: Comparison
FA100 vs Predator GM9000: the sequential read difference
Start with sequential read, because it is the widest measured gap between them: FA100 3300 MB/s against Predator GM9000 14000 MB/s, 76% in favour of Predator GM9000. Speed Score backs the spec sheet up. Predator GM9000 scores 9.7 to 6.4, 34% clear. Sequential write runs the same way, 2700 MB/s on the FA100 versus 13000 MB/s on the Predator GM9000, another win for Predator GM9000. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 3.0 x4 on the FA100 versus PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Predator GM9000. There is a split on dram cache as well, DRAM-less on the FA100 versus DRAM on the Predator GM9000. Nand layers runs the same way, 176 on the FA100 versus 232 on the Predator GM9000, another win for Predator GM9000. Controller is not the same on both, IG5216 on the FA100 versus SM2508 on the Predator GM9000. There is a split on controller vendor as well, InnoGrit on the FA100 versus Silicon Motion on the Predator GM9000.
FA100 vs Predator GM9000: which one fits your build
Buy the FA100 for everyday storage use where 3300 MB/s reads are fast enough. It also earns its place with budget laptop or desktop upgrades wanting 2000 GB on a PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slot. Avoid it for buyers wanting PCIe 4.0 performance, as this drive is limited to 3300 MB/s reads.
What FA100 and Predator GM9000 have in common
Where they agree, they agree completely, capacity, nand type, form factor, drive type and nand vendor included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA100
- 6.4/10-34%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 9.7/10Best
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA100
- Acer
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Acer
Model Number
- Acer FA100
- Acer FA100 (Micron B47R)
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Acer Predator GM9000
Series
- Acer FA100
- FA100
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Predator GM9000
Drive Type
- Acer FA100
- Internal
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA100
- PCIe 3.0 x4
- Acer Predator GM9000
- PCIe 5.0 x4
Form Factor
- Acer FA100
- M.2 2280
- Acer Predator GM9000
- M.2 2280
Capacity
- Acer FA100
- 2000 GB
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 2000 GB
Sequential Read
- Acer FA100
- 3300 MB/s-76%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 14000 MB/s
Sequential Write
- Acer FA100
- 2700 MB/s-79%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 13000 MB/s
Controller
- Acer FA100
- IG5216
- Acer Predator GM9000
- SM2508
Controller Vendor
- Acer FA100
- InnoGrit
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Silicon Motion
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA100
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Acer Predator GM9000
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA100
- TLC
- Acer Predator GM9000
- TLC
NAND Vendor
- Acer FA100
- Micron
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Micron
NAND Layers
- Acer FA100
- 176-24%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 232
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA100 if you want the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB).
Choose Acer Predator GM9000 if you want the higher speed score (9.7 vs 6.4), the higher sequential read (14000 MB/s vs 3300 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (13000 MB/s vs 2700 MB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA100 | Acer Predator GM9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.