Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA100 vs Samsung 870 QVO: Comparison

Acer FA100 vs Samsung 870 QVO sequential read compared

Start with sequential read, because it is the widest measured gap between them: Acer FA100 3300 MB/s against Samsung 870 QVO 560 MB/s, 83% in favour of Acer FA100. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Acer FA100 42% ahead, 6.4 against 3.7. Nand layers runs the same way, 176 on the Acer FA100 versus 96 on the Samsung 870 QVO, another win for Acer FA100. There is a split on controller as well, IG5216 on the Acer FA100 versus Samsung MKX on the Samsung 870 QVO. They differ on controller vendor too, InnoGrit on the Acer FA100 versus Samsung on the Samsung 870 QVO. There is a split on nand vendor as well, Micron on the Acer FA100 versus Samsung on the Samsung 870 QVO.

Who each one is for

Buy the Acer FA100 for everyday storage use where 3300 MB/s reads are fast enough. It also earns its place with budget laptop or desktop upgrades wanting 2000 GB on a PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slot. It is the wrong buy for buyers wanting PCIe 4.0 performance, as this drive is limited to 3300 MB/s reads. The Samsung 870 QVO suits bulk file storage and budget NAS-adjacent SATA use, though it is the wrong buy for OS or boot drives with frequent writes and performance-sensitive workloads. Our rating of the Samsung 870 QVO (7.5/10): the best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Acer FA100 and Samsung 870 QVO differ on bus interface?

Yes. Bus Interface reads PCIe 3.0 x4 on the Acer FA100 versus SATA III on the Samsung 870 QVO.

Is the Drive Type the same on the Acer FA100 and Samsung 870 QVO?

It is. Both are listed at Internal, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA100
    6.4/10Best
    Samsung 870 QVO
    3.7/10-42%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA100
    Acer
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung
  • Model Number

    Acer FA100
    Acer FA100 (Micron B47R)
    Samsung 870 QVO
    870 QVO
  • Series

    Acer FA100
    FA100
    Samsung 870 QVO
    870 QVO
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA100
    Internal
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA100
    PCIe 3.0 x4
    Samsung 870 QVO
    SATA III
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA100
    M.2 2280
    Samsung 870 QVO
    2.5-inch
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA100
    3300 MB/s
    Samsung 870 QVO
    560 MB/s-83%
  • Controller

    Acer FA100
    IG5216
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung MKX
  • Controller Vendor

    Acer FA100
    InnoGrit
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA100
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Samsung 870 QVO
    DRAM
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA100
    TLC
    Samsung 870 QVO
    QLC
  • NAND Vendor

    Acer FA100
    Micron
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung
  • NAND Layers

    Acer FA100
    176
    Samsung 870 QVO
    96-45%

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA100 if you want the higher speed score (6.4 vs 3.7), the higher sequential read (3300 MB/s vs 560 MB/s) and the higher NAND layers (176 vs 96).

    Choose Samsung 870 QVO if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA100Samsung 870 QVO
    AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Samsung 870 QVO

    7.5 / 10 Expert Rating

    The best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA100 with