Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA200 vs Acer Predator GM9000: Comparison
FA200 vs Predator GM9000: the sequential read difference
Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, FA200 7200 MB/s against Predator GM9000 14000 MB/s, a 49% lead for Predator GM9000. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Predator GM9000 32% ahead, 9.7 against 6.6. Sequential write runs the same way, 6200 MB/s on the FA200 versus 13000 MB/s on the Predator GM9000, another win for Predator GM9000. Add endurance tbw to that, 1000 TB on the FA200 versus 1600 TB on the Predator GM9000, and the pattern holds. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 4.0 x4 on the FA200 versus PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Predator GM9000. Nand type is not the same on both, QLC on the FA200 versus TLC on the Predator GM9000. There is a split on dram cache as well, DRAM-less on the FA200 versus DRAM on the Predator GM9000. There is a split on controller as well, MAP1602A on the FA200 versus SM2508 on the Predator GM9000. They differ on controller vendor too, Maxio on the FA200 versus Silicon Motion on the Predator GM9000. They differ on nand vendor too, YMTC on the FA200 versus Micron on the Predator GM9000.
Who each one is for
Take the FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. It is equally the pick for buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. It is the wrong buy for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM.
What FA200 and Predator GM9000 have in common
Everything else lines up. Capacity, form factor, drive type, nand layers and warranty read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA200
- 6.6/10-32%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 9.7/10Best
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA200
- Acer
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Acer
Model Number
- Acer FA200
- Acer FA200
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Acer Predator GM9000
Series
- Acer FA200
- FA200
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Predator GM9000
Drive Type
- Acer FA200
- Internal
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA200
- PCIe 4.0 x4
- Acer Predator GM9000
- PCIe 5.0 x4
Form Factor
- Acer FA200
- M.2 2280
- Acer Predator GM9000
- M.2 2280
Capacity
- Acer FA200
- 2000 GB
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 2000 GB
Sequential Read
- Acer FA200
- 7200 MB/s-49%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 14000 MB/s
Sequential Write
- Acer FA200
- 6200 MB/s-52%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 13000 MB/s
Controller
- Acer FA200
- MAP1602A
- Acer Predator GM9000
- SM2508
Controller Vendor
- Acer FA200
- Maxio
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Silicon Motion
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA200
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Acer Predator GM9000
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA200
- QLC
- Acer Predator GM9000
- TLC
NAND Vendor
- Acer FA200
- YMTC
- Acer Predator GM9000
- Micron
NAND Layers
- Acer FA200
- 232
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 232
Endurance TBW
- Acer FA200
- 1000 TB-37%
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 1600 TBBest
Warranty
- Acer FA200
- 5 Years
- Acer Predator GM9000
- 5 Years
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB) and the higher NAND layers (232 vs 232).
Choose Acer Predator GM9000 if you want the higher speed score (9.7 vs 6.6), the higher sequential read (14000 MB/s vs 7200 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (13000 MB/s vs 6200 MB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA200 | Acer Predator GM9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.