Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA200 vs Anacomda i3: Comparison

Acer FA200 vs Anacomda i3: the sequential write difference

Sequential write is where these two genuinely part company, Acer FA200 6200 MB/s against Anacomda i3 2000 MB/s, a 68% lead for Acer FA200. Speed Score backs the spec sheet up. Acer FA200 scores 6.6 to 6.1, 8% clear. Acer FA200 also leads on sequential read, 7200 MB/s on the Acer FA200 versus 3000 MB/s on the Anacomda i3. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Acer FA200 versus PCIe 3.0 x4 on the Anacomda i3. There is a split on nand type as well, QLC on the Acer FA200 versus TLC on the Anacomda i3. Dram cache is not the same on both, DRAM-less on the Acer FA200 versus DRAM-less with HMB on the Anacomda i3. Nand layers runs the same way, 232 on the Acer FA200 versus 176 on the Anacomda i3, another win for Acer FA200. There is a split on controller as well, MAP1602A on the Acer FA200 versus MAP1202A-F1C on the Anacomda i3. They differ on nand vendor too, YMTC on the Acer FA200 versus SK hynix on the Anacomda i3.

Who each one is for

Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. The same goes for buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. Avoid it for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM.

What Acer FA200 and Anacomda i3 have in common

Everything else lines up. Capacity, form factor, drive type, controller vendor and warranty read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA200
    6.6/10Best
    Anacomda i3
    6.1/10-8%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA200
    Acer
    Anacomda i3
    Anacomda
  • Model Number

    Acer FA200
    Acer FA200
    Anacomda i3
    Anacomda i3 (MAP1202 + SK Hynix V7 512Gb)
  • Series

    Acer FA200
    FA200
    Anacomda i3
    i3
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA200
    Internal
    Anacomda i3
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA200
    PCIe 4.0 x4
    Anacomda i3
    PCIe 3.0 x4
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA200
    M.2 2280
    Anacomda i3
    M.2 2280
  • Capacity

    Acer FA200
    2000 GB
    Anacomda i3
    2000 GB
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA200
    7200 MB/s
    Anacomda i3
    3000 MB/s-58%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA200
    6200 MB/s
    Anacomda i3
    2000 MB/s-68%
  • Controller

    Acer FA200
    MAP1602A
    Anacomda i3
    MAP1202A-F1C
  • Controller Vendor

    Acer FA200
    Maxio
    Anacomda i3
    Maxio
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA200
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Anacomda i3
    DRAM-less with HMB
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA200
    QLC
    Anacomda i3
    TLC
  • NAND Vendor

    Acer FA200
    YMTC
    Anacomda i3
    SK hynix
  • NAND Layers

    Acer FA200
    232
    Anacomda i3
    176-24%
  • Warranty

    Acer FA200
    5 Years
    Anacomda i3
    5 Years

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher speed score (6.6 vs 6.1), the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB) and the higher sequential read (7200 MB/s vs 3000 MB/s).

    Choose Anacomda i3 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA200Anacomda i3
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA200 with