Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA200 vs Biwin M350: Comparison

Acer FA200 vs Biwin M350 sequential read compared

Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, Acer FA200 7200 MB/s against Biwin M350 5200 MB/s, a 28% lead for Acer FA200. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Acer FA200 returns 6.6 against 6, a 9% lead. Add sequential write to that, 6200 MB/s on the Acer FA200 versus 4800 MB/s on the Biwin M350, and the pattern holds. Dram cache is not the same on both, DRAM-less on the Acer FA200 versus DRAM-less with HMB on the Biwin M350. There is a split on controller as well, MAP1602A on the Acer FA200 versus SM2268XT2 on the Biwin M350. There is a split on controller vendor as well, Maxio on the Acer FA200 versus Silicon Motion on the Biwin M350. They differ on nand vendor too, YMTC on the Acer FA200 versus Micron on the Biwin M350.

Acer FA200 vs Biwin M350: which one fits your build

Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. It is equally the pick for buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. It is the wrong buy for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM.

What Acer FA200 and Biwin M350 have in common

The common ground is wider than the gap: capacity, bus interface, nand type, form factor and drive type are identical here. They match on 1 further specification as well.

Frequently asked questions

Is the NAND Layers the same on the Acer FA200 and Biwin M350?

It is. Both are listed at 232, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA200
    6.6/10Best
    Biwin M350
    6.0/10-9%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA200
    Acer
    Biwin M350
    Biwin
  • Model Number

    Acer FA200
    Acer FA200
    Biwin M350
    Biwin M350
  • Series

    Acer FA200
    FA200
    Biwin M350
    M350
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA200
    Internal
    Biwin M350
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA200
    PCIe 4.0 x4
    Biwin M350
    PCIe 4.0 x4
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA200
    M.2 2280
    Biwin M350
    M.2 2280
  • Capacity

    Acer FA200
    2000 GB
    Biwin M350
    2000 GB
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA200
    7200 MB/s
    Biwin M350
    5200 MB/s-28%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA200
    6200 MB/s
    Biwin M350
    4800 MB/s-23%
  • Controller

    Acer FA200
    MAP1602A
    Biwin M350
    SM2268XT2
  • Controller Vendor

    Acer FA200
    Maxio
    Biwin M350
    Silicon Motion
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA200
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Biwin M350
    DRAM-less with HMB
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA200
    QLC
    Biwin M350
    QLC
  • NAND Vendor

    Acer FA200
    YMTC
    Biwin M350
    Micron
  • NAND Layers

    Acer FA200
    232
    Biwin M350
    232

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher speed score (6.6 vs 6.0), the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB) and the higher sequential read (7200 MB/s vs 5200 MB/s).

    Choose Biwin M350 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA200Biwin M350
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA200 with