Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA200 vs Biwin M560: Comparison
What is the difference between Acer FA200 and Biwin M560?
The gap that matters here is sequential read: Acer FA200 7200 MB/s against Biwin M560 11000 MB/s, which puts Biwin M560 35% ahead. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Biwin M560 22% ahead, 8.5 against 6.6. Sequential write runs the same way, 6200 MB/s on the Acer FA200 versus 10000 MB/s on the Biwin M560, another win for Biwin M560. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Acer FA200 versus PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Biwin M560. There is a split on nand type as well, QLC on the Acer FA200 versus TLC on the Biwin M560. They differ on dram cache too, DRAM-less on the Acer FA200 versus DRAM-less with HMB on the Biwin M560. Nand layers is closer, 232 on the Acer FA200 versus 218 on the Biwin M560. Controller is not the same on both, MAP1602A on the Acer FA200 versus SM2504XT on the Biwin M560. They differ on controller vendor too, Maxio on the Acer FA200 versus Silicon Motion on the Biwin M560. They differ on nand vendor too, YMTC on the Acer FA200 versus Kioxia on the Biwin M560.
Who each one is for
Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. It is equally the pick for buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. Avoid it for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM.
Where the two are identical
Everything else lines up. Capacity, form factor and drive type read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA200
- 6.6/10-22%
- Biwin M560
- 8.5/10Best
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA200
- Acer
- Biwin M560
- Biwin
Model Number
- Acer FA200
- Acer FA200
- Biwin M560
- Biwin M560
Series
- Acer FA200
- FA200
- Biwin M560
- M560
Drive Type
- Acer FA200
- Internal
- Biwin M560
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA200
- PCIe 4.0 x4
- Biwin M560
- PCIe 5.0 x4
Form Factor
- Acer FA200
- M.2 2280
- Biwin M560
- M.2 2280
Capacity
- Acer FA200
- 2000 GB
- Biwin M560
- 2000 GB
Sequential Read
- Acer FA200
- 7200 MB/s-35%
- Biwin M560
- 11000 MB/s
Sequential Write
- Acer FA200
- 6200 MB/s-38%
- Biwin M560
- 10000 MB/s
Controller
- Acer FA200
- MAP1602A
- Biwin M560
- SM2504XT
Controller Vendor
- Acer FA200
- Maxio
- Biwin M560
- Silicon Motion
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA200
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Biwin M560
- DRAM-less with HMB
NAND Type
- Acer FA200
- QLC
- Biwin M560
- TLC
NAND Vendor
- Acer FA200
- YMTC
- Biwin M560
- Kioxia
NAND Layers
- Acer FA200
- 232
- Biwin M560
- 218-6%
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB) and the higher NAND layers (232 vs 218).
Choose Biwin M560 if you want the higher speed score (8.5 vs 6.6), the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 7200 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (10000 MB/s vs 6200 MB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA200 | Biwin M560 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.