Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA200 vs Corsair MP600 Core XT: Comparison
Acer FA200 vs Corsair MP600 Core XT: the sequential read difference
On sequential read the spread is 31%, Acer FA200 7200 MB/s against Corsair MP600 Core XT 5000 MB/s, so Acer FA200 takes it. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Acer FA200 returns 6.6 against 6, a 9% lead. Acer FA200 also leads on sequential write, 6200 MB/s on the Acer FA200 versus 4400 MB/s on the Corsair MP600 Core XT. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Acer FA200 versus PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe on the Corsair MP600 Core XT. There is a split on nand type as well, QLC on the Acer FA200 versus QLC, DRAMless with HMB on the Corsair MP600 Core XT. The warranty figures are near enough to ignore, 5 Years on the Acer FA200 versus 3 Years on the Corsair MP600 Core XT.
Acer FA200 vs Corsair MP600 Core XT: which one fits your build
Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. The same goes for buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. It is the wrong buy for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM. Take the Corsair MP600 Core XT for buyers who want large storage capacity at a low cost per terabyte for game and media libraries. QLC NAND keeps this drive's pricing competitive at higher capacities. Avoid it for buyers running very large sustained write workloads like video editing raw footage transfers. A TLC-based drive like the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus, covered elsewhere on this site, sustains write performance more consistently.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA200
- 6.6/10Best
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 6.0/10-9%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA200
- Acer
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- Corsair
Model Number
- Acer FA200
- Acer FA200
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- MP600 Core XT
Series
- Acer FA200
- FA200
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- MP600 Core XT
Bus Interface
- Acer FA200
- PCIe 4.0 x4
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
Sequential Read
- Acer FA200
- 7200 MB/s
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 5000 MB/s-31%
Sequential Write
- Acer FA200
- 6200 MB/s
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 4400 MB/s-29%
NAND Type
- Acer FA200
- QLC
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- QLC, DRAMless with HMB
Warranty
- Acer FA200
- 5 YearsBest
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 3 Years
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher speed score (6.6 vs 6.0), the higher sequential read (7200 MB/s vs 5000 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6200 MB/s vs 4400 MB/s).
Choose Corsair MP600 Core XT if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA200 | Corsair MP600 Core XT |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Corsair Store | View on Corsair Store |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.