Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA200 vs Lexar NM790: Comparison

Acer FA200 vs Lexar NM790: the sequential read difference

There is no decisive spec gap here. Sequential read splits them by a margin most buyers will never feel, Acer FA200 7200 MB/s against Lexar NM790 7400 MB/s. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Lexar NM790 14% ahead, 7.7 against 6.6. On sequential write there is little in it, 6200 MB/s on the Acer FA200 versus 6500 MB/s on the Lexar NM790. There is a split on bus interface as well, PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Acer FA200 versus PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe on the Lexar NM790. Nand type is not the same on both, QLC on the Acer FA200 versus TLC, DRAM-Less with Host Memory Buffer on the Lexar NM790.

Who each one is for

Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. It also earns its place with buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. It is the wrong buy for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM. Buy the Lexar NM790 for budget-conscious gaming builds and PS5 storage expansion, though it is the wrong buy for sustained heavy write workloads and professional workstation use. Our rating of the Lexar NM790 (8.2/10): one of the best value flagship-speed drives available, though the DRAM-less design trades some sustained-write consistency.

Where the two are identical

The common ground is wider than the gap: warranty are identical here.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA200
    6.6/10-14%
    Lexar NM790
    7.7/10Best

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA200
    Acer
    Lexar NM790
    Lexar
  • Model Number

    Acer FA200
    Acer FA200
    Lexar NM790
    NM790
  • Series

    Acer FA200
    FA200
    Lexar NM790
    NM790
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA200
    PCIe 4.0 x4
    Lexar NM790
    PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA200
    7200 MB/s-3%
    Lexar NM790
    7400 MB/s
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA200
    6200 MB/s-5%
    Lexar NM790
    6500 MB/s
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA200
    QLC
    Lexar NM790
    TLC, DRAM-Less with Host Memory Buffer
  • Warranty

    Acer FA200
    5 Years
    Lexar NM790
    5 Years

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA200 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Choose Lexar NM790 if you want the higher speed score (7.7 vs 6.6), the higher sequential read (7400 MB/s vs 7200 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6500 MB/s vs 6200 MB/s).

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA200Lexar NM790
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Lexar NM790

    8.2 / 10 Expert Rating

    One of the best value flagship-speed drives available, though the DRAM-less design trades some sustained-write consistency.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA200 with