Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA200 vs Samsung 870 EVO: Comparison

What is the difference between Acer FA200 and Samsung 870 EVO?

Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, Acer FA200 7200 MB/s against Samsung 870 EVO 560 MB/s, a 92% lead for Acer FA200. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Acer FA200 returns 6.6 against 5.1, a 23% lead. Add sequential write to that, 6200 MB/s on the Acer FA200 versus 530 MB/s on the Samsung 870 EVO, and the pattern holds.

Which should you buy, Acer FA200 or Samsung 870 EVO?

Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. It also earns its place with buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. It is the wrong buy for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM. Take the Samsung 870 EVO for buyers upgrading an older system that only supports SATA, not NVMe. This is specifically where a SATA drive remains the right, and only, choice. It is equally the pick for anyone who wants the single most reliable, "buy it and forget it" SATA option available. This drive's specific reputation is built on consistency and sustained performance, not being the flashiest choice. It is not the one for anyone building a new system with NVMe support available. Even a budget NVMe drive like the Crucial NV3, covered elsewhere on this site, delivers meaningfully faster real-world performance than any SATA drive can reach.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Acer FA200 and Samsung 870 EVO differ on bus interface?

Yes. Bus Interface reads PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Acer FA200 versus SATA III, 2.5-Inch on the Samsung 870 EVO.

Is the Drive Type the same on the Acer FA200 and Samsung 870 EVO?

It is. Both are listed at Internal, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA200
    6.6/10Best
    Samsung 870 EVO
    5.1/10-23%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA200
    Acer
    Samsung 870 EVO
    Samsung
  • Model Number

    Acer FA200
    Acer FA200
    Samsung 870 EVO
    870 EVO
  • Series

    Acer FA200
    FA200
    Samsung 870 EVO
    Samsung 870 EVO
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA200
    Internal
    Samsung 870 EVO
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA200
    PCIe 4.0 x4
    Samsung 870 EVO
    SATA III, 2.5-Inch
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA200
    M.2 2280
    Samsung 870 EVO
    2.5-inch
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA200
    7200 MB/s
    Samsung 870 EVO
    560 MB/s-92%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA200
    6200 MB/s
    Samsung 870 EVO
    530 MB/s-91%
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA200
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Samsung 870 EVO
    DRAM
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA200
    QLC
    Samsung 870 EVO
    TLC with DRAM Cache
  • Endurance TBW

    Acer FA200
    1000 TB
    Samsung 870 EVO
    Up to ~2,400 TBW (Larger Capacities)Best
  • Warranty

    Acer FA200
    5 Years
    Samsung 870 EVO
    5 Years

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher speed score (6.6 vs 5.1), the higher sequential read (7200 MB/s vs 560 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6200 MB/s vs 530 MB/s).

    Choose Samsung 870 EVO if you want the higher endurance TBW (Up to ~2,400 TBW (Larger Capacities) vs 1000 TB).

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA200Samsung 870 EVO
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA200 with