Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA200 vs Samsung 870 QVO: Comparison

What is the difference between Acer FA200 and Samsung 870 QVO?

Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, Acer FA200 7200 MB/s against Samsung 870 QVO 560 MB/s, a 92% lead for Acer FA200. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Acer FA200 44% ahead, 6.6 against 3.7. Acer FA200 also leads on nand layers, 232 on the Acer FA200 versus 96 on the Samsung 870 QVO. They differ on form factor too, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA200 versus 2.5-inch on the Samsung 870 QVO. Controller is not the same on both, MAP1602A on the Acer FA200 versus Samsung MKX on the Samsung 870 QVO. Controller vendor is not the same on both, Maxio on the Acer FA200 versus Samsung on the Samsung 870 QVO. There is a split on nand vendor as well, YMTC on the Acer FA200 versus Samsung on the Samsung 870 QVO.

Which should you buy, Acer FA200 or Samsung 870 QVO?

Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. It also earns its place with buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. Avoid it for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM. The Samsung 870 QVO suits bulk file storage and budget NAS-adjacent SATA use, though it is not built for OS or boot drives with frequent writes and performance-sensitive workloads. Our rating of the Samsung 870 QVO (7.5/10): the best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Acer FA200 and Samsung 870 QVO differ on bus interface?

Yes. Bus Interface reads PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Acer FA200 versus SATA III on the Samsung 870 QVO.

Is the NAND Type the same on the Acer FA200 and Samsung 870 QVO?

It is. Both are listed at QLC, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA200
    6.6/10Best
    Samsung 870 QVO
    3.7/10-44%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA200
    Acer
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung
  • Model Number

    Acer FA200
    Acer FA200
    Samsung 870 QVO
    870 QVO
  • Series

    Acer FA200
    FA200
    Samsung 870 QVO
    870 QVO
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA200
    Internal
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA200
    PCIe 4.0 x4
    Samsung 870 QVO
    SATA III
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA200
    M.2 2280
    Samsung 870 QVO
    2.5-inch
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA200
    7200 MB/s
    Samsung 870 QVO
    560 MB/s-92%
  • Controller

    Acer FA200
    MAP1602A
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung MKX
  • Controller Vendor

    Acer FA200
    Maxio
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA200
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Samsung 870 QVO
    DRAM
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA200
    QLC
    Samsung 870 QVO
    QLC
  • NAND Vendor

    Acer FA200
    YMTC
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung
  • NAND Layers

    Acer FA200
    232
    Samsung 870 QVO
    96-59%
  • Warranty

    Acer FA200
    5 YearsBest
    Samsung 870 QVO
    3 Years

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher speed score (6.6 vs 3.7), the higher sequential read (7200 MB/s vs 560 MB/s) and the higher NAND layers (232 vs 96).

    Choose Samsung 870 QVO if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA200Samsung 870 QVO
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Samsung 870 QVO

    7.5 / 10 Expert Rating

    The best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA200 with