Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA200 vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus: Comparison
Acer FA200 vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus: the sequential read difference
Expect a near tie. The closest thing to a difference is sequential read, Acer FA200 7200 MB/s against Samsung 990 EVO Plus 7250 MB/s. Speed Score backs the spec sheet up. Samsung 990 EVO Plus scores 7.7 to 6.6, 14% clear. Nand type is not the same on both, QLC on the Acer FA200 versus TLC on the Samsung 990 EVO Plus. Dram cache is not the same on both, DRAM-less on the Acer FA200 versus DRAM-less with HMB on the Samsung 990 EVO Plus.
Which should you buy, Acer FA200 or Samsung 990 EVO Plus?
Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. It is equally the pick for buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. It is the wrong buy for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM. Take the Samsung 990 EVO Plus for buyers upgrading a system where the exact motherboard generation or future upgrade path is uncertain. The hybrid lane configuration adapts sensibly either way. The same goes for anyone who wants a taste of PCIe 5.0 technology without paying for or needing a dedicated flagship 4-lane Gen 5 drive. A genuinely balanced middle-ground option. It is not the one for buyers who specifically want to maximize a confirmed PCIe 5.0 x4 motherboard slot. The Samsung 9100 PRO, covered elsewhere on this site, delivers considerably higher peak performance in that specific scenario.
Frequently asked questions
Do the Acer FA200 and Samsung 990 EVO Plus differ on sequential write?
Yes. Sequential Write reads 6200 MB/s on the Acer FA200 versus 6300 MB/s on the Samsung 990 EVO Plus.
Is the Form Factor the same on the Acer FA200 and Samsung 990 EVO Plus?
It is. Both are listed at M.2 2280, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA200
- 6.6/10-14%
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- 7.7/10Best
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA200
- Acer
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- Samsung
Model Number
- Acer FA200
- Acer FA200
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- 990 EVO Plus
Series
- Acer FA200
- FA200
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
Drive Type
- Acer FA200
- Internal
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA200
- PCIe 4.0 x4
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- Hybrid PCIe 5.0 x2 / PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
Form Factor
- Acer FA200
- M.2 2280
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- M.2 2280
Sequential Read
- Acer FA200
- 7200 MB/s-1%
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- 7250 MB/s
Sequential Write
- Acer FA200
- 6200 MB/s-2%
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- 6300 MB/s
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA200
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- DRAM-less with HMB
NAND Type
- Acer FA200
- QLC
- Samsung 990 EVO Plus
- TLC
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA200 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Choose Samsung 990 EVO Plus if you want the higher speed score (7.7 vs 6.6), the higher sequential read (7250 MB/s vs 7200 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6300 MB/s vs 6200 MB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA200 | Samsung 990 EVO Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.