Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 vs Blackmagic Design Web Presenter: Comparison
AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 vs Blackmagic Design Web Presenter latency compared
On latency the spread is 1500%, AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 16 ms against Blackmagic Design Web Presenter 1 ms, so Blackmagic Design Web Presenter takes it.
Which should you buy, AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 or Blackmagic Design Web Presenter?
Buy the AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 for Single-PC streamers who game and stream from the same machine and anyone standardized on AVerMedia's RECentral software ecosystem. It also earns its place with streamers capturing HDR console footage who want encoding off their PC's CPU. It is the wrong buy for buyers who already have a spare NVENC-capable GPU and don't need onboard encoding. The Blackmagic Design Web Presenter is the one to take for professional presenters switching between two SDI or HDMI camera feeds and corporate or house-of-worship AV setups needing hardware switching with tally, though it is the wrong buy for simple single-camera streamers who don't need hardware switching. The same goes for studios that need a clean UVC webcam output for Zoom or Teams from broadcast gear. Avoid it for console or PC gaming capture, since there's no HDR or 4K support. Our rating of the AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 (8/10): A genuinely useful onboard-encoder pick for single-PC streamers doing HDR console capture, though it costs more than AVerMedia's simpler externals. Our rating of the Blackmagic Design Web Presenter (8/10): excellent for professional two-camera presenting setups that need to output as a plain webcam. Overkill and the wrong tool for gaming capture.
Frequently asked questions
Do the AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 and Blackmagic Design Web Presenter differ on connection type?
Yes. Connection Type reads USB-C / Thunderbolt on the AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 versus USB 3.0 / 3.2 Gen 1 on the Blackmagic Design Web Presenter.
Is the Form Factor the same on the AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 and Blackmagic Design Web Presenter?
It is. Both are listed at External USB, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Form Factor
- AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
- External USB
- Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
- External USB
Brand
- AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
- AVerMedia
- Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
- Blackmagic Design
Model Number
- AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
- Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 (GC553)
- Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
- Web Presenter HD
Connection Type
- AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
- USB-C / Thunderbolt
- Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
- USB 3.0 / 3.2 Gen 1
Max Recording Resolution
- AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
- 4K30 HDR
- Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
- 1080p60
Passthrough Resolution
- AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
- 4K60 HDR
- Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
- 1080p60
HDR Support
- AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
- Yes
- Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
- No
Latency
- AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
- 16 ms-1500%
- Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
- 1 msBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Choose Blackmagic Design Web Presenter if you want the lower latency (1 ms vs 16 ms).
Price comparison
| Retailer | AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1 | Blackmagic Design Web Presenter |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
AVerMedia Live Gamer Ultra 2.1
8 / 10 Expert Rating
A genuinely useful onboard-encoder pick for single-PC streamers doing HDR console capture, though it costs more than AVerMedia's simpler externals.
Blackmagic Design Web Presenter
8 / 10 Expert Rating
Excellent for professional two-camera presenting setups that need to output as a plain webcam.