Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 vs Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB: Comparison
Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 vs Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB fan count compared
On fan count the spread is 50%, Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 2 against Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB 1, so Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 takes it. Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB also leads on static pressure, 2.2 mmH2O on the Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 versus 3.07 mmH2O on the Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB. Add airflow to that, 56.3 CFM on the Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 versus 71.32 CFM on the Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB, and the pattern holds.
Who each one is for
Take the Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 for buyers who want genuine liquid-cooling value in a compact 240mm form factor. This is widely regarded as the strongest value pick in this exact category. It also earns its place with compact cases that can't fit a 360mm radiator. The 240mm size opens up liquid cooling to a broader range of case options. Avoid it for the hottest, most demanding CPUs. The Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360 or Pro 360 ARGB, both covered elsewhere on this site, offer more headroom for sustained high-wattage loads. The Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB suits tight-budget builds that still want RGB lighting and mainstream 230W-class CPUs at stock clocks, though it is the wrong buy for extreme overclocked CPUs beyond 230W and anyone prioritizing brand-name thermal performance over price. It is not the one for noise-sensitive builds, since it can run louder than some competitors at full speed.
Frequently asked questions
Do the Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 and Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB differ on max speed?
Yes. Max Speed reads 1800 RPM on the Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 versus 1600 RPM on the Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB.
Is the Fan Size the same on the Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 and Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB?
It is. Both are listed at 120 mm, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- Arctic
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Enermax
Cooler Type
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- AIO Liquid
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Air Tower
Series
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE
Model Number
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- ACFRE00134A
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- ETS-T50A-BK-ARGB
Socket Compatibility
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- AMD AM4/AM5, Intel LGA1851/1700
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Intel LGA1851/1700/1200/115x/2066/2011/2011-3/1366, AMD AM5/AM4/AM3+/FM2+/FM1
Tower Layout
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- Not Applicable
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Single-Tower
Fan Count
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- 2Best
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 1-50%
Cooler Weight
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- 1490 g
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 860 gBest
Fan Size
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- 120 mm
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 120 mm
Max Speed
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- 1800 RPMBest
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 1600 RPM-11%
Airflow
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- 56.3 CFM-21%
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 71.32 CFMBest
Static Pressure
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- 2.2 mmH2O-28%
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 3.07 mmH2O
PWM Control
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240
- Yes
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Yes
Which one should you pick?
Choose Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 if you want the higher fan count (2 vs 1) and the higher max speed (1800 RPM vs 1600 RPM).
Choose Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB if you want the higher airflow (71.32 CFM vs 56.3 CFM) and the higher static pressure (3.07 mmH2O vs 2.2 mmH2O).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 | Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
7 / 10 Expert Rating
A budget ARGB cooler that competes reasonably in its price bracket and offers unusually broad socket support, without standing out against established budget-cooler competitors on raw thermals.