Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 vs Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB: Comparison
What is the difference between EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 and Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB?
There is no decisive spec gap here. Noise level splits them by a margin most buyers will never feel, EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 33.5 dBA against Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB 24 dBA. Add fan count to that, 2 on the EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 versus 1 on the Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB, and the pattern holds. Add max speed to that, 2200 RPM on the EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 versus 1600 RPM on the Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB, and the pattern holds.
EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 vs Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB: which one fits your build
Take the EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 for buyers who specifically want an EK-branded product, whether from custom-loop brand familiarity or ecosystem preference. This is EK's accessible entry into the pre-built AIO space for exactly this audience. It is equally the pick for compact cases needing a straightforward 240mm liquid cooling solution. Covers mainstream needs without requiring 360mm clearance. It is not the one for buyers specifically chasing the strongest value-per-dollar in this radiator size without a brand preference. The Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240, covered elsewhere on this site, carries the stronger independent testing reputation at a comparable price. The Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB suits tight-budget builds that still want RGB lighting and mainstream 230W-class CPUs at stock clocks, though it is not built for extreme overclocked CPUs beyond 230W and anyone prioritizing brand-name thermal performance over price. It is the wrong buy for noise-sensitive builds, since it can run louder than some competitors at full speed.
Frequently asked questions
Do the EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 and Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB differ on airflow?
Yes. Airflow reads 77 CFM on the EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 versus 71.32 CFM on the Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB.
Is the Fan Size the same on the EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 and Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB?
It is. Both are listed at 120 mm, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- EK Waterblocks
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Enermax
Cooler Type
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- AIO Liquid
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Air Tower
Series
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- EK-AIO Basic 240
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE
Model Number
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- EK-AIO Basic 240
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- ETS-T50A-BK-ARGB
Socket Compatibility
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- AMD AM5/AM4, Intel LGA2066/2011-3/2011/1200/1156/1155/1151/1150
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Intel LGA1851/1700/1200/115x/2066/2011/2011-3/1366, AMD AM5/AM4/AM3+/FM2+/FM1
Tower Layout
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- Not Applicable
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Single-Tower
Fan Count
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- 2Best
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 1-50%
Noise Level
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- 33.5 dBA
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 24 dBABest
RGB Lighting
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- No
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Yes
Fan Size
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- 120 mm
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 120 mm
Max Speed
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- 2200 RPMBest
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 1600 RPM-27%
Airflow
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- 77 CFMBest
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 71.32 CFM-7%
Static Pressure
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- 2.89 mmH2O-6%
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- 3.07 mmH2O
PWM Control
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- Yes
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- Yes
Lighting
- EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240
- None
- Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
- ARGB
Which one should you pick?
Choose EKWB EK-AIO Basic 240 if you want the higher fan count (2 vs 1), the higher max speed (2200 RPM vs 1600 RPM) and the higher airflow (77 CFM vs 71.32 CFM).
Choose Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB if you want the lower noise level (24 dBA vs 33.5 dBA) and the higher static pressure (3.07 mmH2O vs 2.89 mmH2O).
Verdict
Enermax ETS-T50 AXE ARGB
7 / 10 Expert Rating
A budget ARGB cooler that competes reasonably in its price bracket and offers unusually broad socket support, without standing out against established budget-cooler competitors on raw thermals.