Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Attack Shark X3 vs BenQ Zowie ZA13-C: Comparison
What is the difference between Attack Shark X3 and BenQ Zowie ZA13-C?
The gap that matters here is weight: Attack Shark X3 59 g against BenQ Zowie ZA13-C 90 g, which puts Attack Shark X3 53% ahead. They differ on sensor model too, PixArt PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI on the Attack Shark X3 versus PixArt PMW3360 on the BenQ Zowie ZA13-C. There is a split on connectivity as well, Wireless , Wired on the Attack Shark X3 versus Wired on the BenQ Zowie ZA13-C. Switch type is not the same on both, Optical on the Attack Shark X3 versus Mechanical on the BenQ Zowie ZA13-C.
Who each one is for
Take the Attack Shark X3 for budget-conscious buyers who want a flagship-tier sensor without paying boutique brand pricing. This mouse delivers PAW3395 performance at a notably lower cost. It is not the one for buyers who want the highest available polling rate. The Lamzu Atlantis Mini Pro or ASUS ROG Keris II Ace, both covered elsewhere on this site, reach up to 8000Hz. The BenQ Zowie ZA13-C suits palm grip players with medium to large hands and competitive FPS players who prefer a driverless mouse, though it is not built for fingertip or claw grip players wanting a smaller shell and buyers who want RGB or onboard memory. Our rating of the BenQ Zowie ZA13-C (8/10): A tall, grippy esports mouse for palm grip players who want the Zowie no-frills philosophy in a larger shell.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, polling rate, grip type and shape included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Attack Shark X3
- Attack Shark
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- BenQ Zowie
Connectivity
- Attack Shark X3
- Wireless (2.4GHz), Wired
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- Wired
Grip Type
- Attack Shark X3
- Ambidextrous
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- Ambidextrous
Model
- Attack Shark X3
- X3
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- ZA13-C
Shape
- Attack Shark X3
- Symmetrical
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- Symmetrical
Sensor Model
- Attack Shark X3
- PixArt PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- PixArt PMW3360
Polling Rate
- Attack Shark X3
- 1000 Hz
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- 1000 Hz
Weight
- Attack Shark X3
- 59 gBest
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- 90 g-53%
Switch Type
- Attack Shark X3
- Optical
- BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
- Mechanical
Which one should you pick?
Choose Attack Shark X3 if you want the higher polling rate (1000 Hz vs 1000 Hz) and the lower weight (59 g vs 90 g).
Choose BenQ Zowie ZA13-C if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Attack Shark X3 | BenQ Zowie ZA13-C |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
BenQ Zowie ZA13-C
8 / 10 Expert Rating
A tall, grippy esports mouse for palm grip players who want the Zowie no-frills philosophy in a larger shell.