Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Attack Shark X3 vs Endgame Gear XM2we: Comparison
What is the difference between Attack Shark X3 and Endgame Gear XM2we?
The first real difference is sensor model: Attack Shark X3 PixArt PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI against Endgame Gear XM2we PixArt PAW3370, up to 19,000 DPI. Add weight to that, 59 g on the Attack Shark X3 versus 66 g on the Endgame Gear XM2we, and the pattern holds. They differ on connectivity too, Wireless , Wired on the Attack Shark X3 versus Wireless on the Endgame Gear XM2we. There is a split on switch type as well, Optical on the Attack Shark X3 versus Kailh GM 8.0 on the Endgame Gear XM2we.
Who each one is for
Take the Attack Shark X3 for budget-conscious buyers who want a flagship-tier sensor without paying boutique brand pricing. This mouse delivers PAW3395 performance at a notably lower cost. Avoid it for buyers who want the highest available polling rate. The Lamzu Atlantis Mini Pro or ASUS ROG Keris II Ace, both covered elsewhere on this site, reach up to 8000Hz. The Endgame Gear XM2we is the one to take for fans of the XM1/XM2 symmetrical shape and ambidextrous claw and palm grip users, though it is not the pick for players who specifically want 4000Hz or 8000Hz polling and anyone wanting RGB lighting. Our rating of the Endgame Gear XM2we (8/10): A comfortable, no-frills wireless upgrade for fans of Endgame Gear's XM shape.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: polling rate, grip type and shape are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Attack Shark X3
- Attack Shark
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- Endgame Gear
Connectivity
- Attack Shark X3
- Wireless (2.4GHz), Wired
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- Wireless (2.4GHz)
Grip Type
- Attack Shark X3
- Ambidextrous
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- Ambidextrous
Model
- Attack Shark X3
- X3
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- XM2we
Shape
- Attack Shark X3
- Symmetrical
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- Symmetrical
Sensor Model
- Attack Shark X3
- PixArt PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- PixArt PAW3370, up to 19,000 DPI
Polling Rate
- Attack Shark X3
- 1000 Hz
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- 1000 Hz
Weight
- Attack Shark X3
- 59 gBest
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- 66 g-12%
Battery Life
- Attack Shark X3
- Up to 70 Hours
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- Up to 70 hours
Switch Type
- Attack Shark X3
- Optical
- Endgame Gear XM2we
- Kailh GM 8.0
Which one should you pick?
Choose Attack Shark X3 if you want the higher polling rate (1000 Hz vs 1000 Hz) and the lower weight (59 g vs 66 g).
Choose Endgame Gear XM2we if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Attack Shark X3 | Endgame Gear XM2we |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Endgame Gear XM2we
8 / 10 Expert Rating
A comfortable, no-frills wireless upgrade for fans of Endgame Gear's XM shape.