Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Attack Shark X3 vs Glorious Model O Wireless: Comparison
What is the difference between Attack Shark X3 and Glorious Model O Wireless?
On weight the spread is 17%, Attack Shark X3 59 g against Glorious Model O Wireless 69 g, so Attack Shark X3 takes it. They differ on sensor model too, PixArt PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI on the Attack Shark X3 versus BAMF on the Glorious Model O Wireless. They differ on connectivity too, Wireless , Wired on the Attack Shark X3 versus Wireless 2.4G on the Glorious Model O Wireless. On battery life there is little in it, Up to 70 Hours on the Attack Shark X3 versus 71 h on the Glorious Model O Wireless. There is a split on switch type as well, Optical on the Attack Shark X3 versus Mechanical on the Glorious Model O Wireless.
Which should you buy, Attack Shark X3 or Glorious Model O Wireless?
Take the Attack Shark X3 for budget-conscious buyers who want a flagship-tier sensor without paying boutique brand pricing. This mouse delivers PAW3395 performance at a notably lower cost. It is the wrong buy for buyers who want the highest available polling rate. The Lamzu Atlantis Mini Pro or ASUS ROG Keris II Ace, both covered elsewhere on this site, reach up to 8000Hz. The Glorious Model O Wireless is the one to take for ambidextrous and left-handed players wanting a symmetrical wireless shell and gram-counters who still want RGB lighting, though it is not built for palm grip users wanting a larger ergonomic shell and anyone chasing the absolute lowest weight on the market. Our rating of the Glorious Model O Wireless (8/10): A genuinely light wireless honeycomb mouse with a proven sensor, still relevant years after popularizing the category.
Where the two are identical
Everything else lines up. Polling rate, grip type and shape read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Attack Shark X3
- Attack Shark
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- Glorious
Connectivity
- Attack Shark X3
- Wireless (2.4GHz), Wired
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- Wireless 2.4G
Grip Type
- Attack Shark X3
- Ambidextrous
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- Ambidextrous
Model
- Attack Shark X3
- X3
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- Model O Wireless
Shape
- Attack Shark X3
- Symmetrical
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- Symmetrical
Sensor Model
- Attack Shark X3
- PixArt PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- BAMF
Polling Rate
- Attack Shark X3
- 1000 Hz
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- 1000 Hz
Weight
- Attack Shark X3
- 59 gBest
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- 69 g-17%
Battery Life
- Attack Shark X3
- Up to 70 Hours
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- 71 hBest
Switch Type
- Attack Shark X3
- Optical
- Glorious Model O Wireless
- Mechanical
Which one should you pick?
Choose Attack Shark X3 if you want the higher polling rate (1000 Hz vs 1000 Hz) and the lower weight (59 g vs 69 g).
Choose Glorious Model O Wireless if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Attack Shark X3 | Glorious Model O Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Newegg | View on Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Glorious Model O Wireless
8 / 10 Expert Rating
A genuinely light wireless honeycomb mouse with a proven sensor, still relevant years after popularizing the category.