Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

AMD Instinct MI210 vs AMD Radeon R9 285: Comparison

Instinct MI210 vs Radeon R9 285: the memory bandwidth difference

The gap that matters here is memory bandwidth: Instinct MI210 1600 GB/s against Radeon R9 285 176 GB/s, which puts Instinct MI210 89% ahead. Radeon R9 285 also leads on tdp, 300 W on the Instinct MI210 versus 190 W on the Radeon R9 285. Instinct MI210 also leads on memory bus width, 4096 bit on the Instinct MI210 versus 256 bit on the Radeon R9 285. Add card length to that, 267 mm on the Instinct MI210 versus 221 mm on the Radeon R9 285, and the pattern holds.

Who each one is for

The Instinct MI210 is the one to take for double-precision workloads that don't need MI250X-level throughput, though it is not built for any desktop or workstation build - compute-only, no display output and maximum-throughput HPC nodes (use MI250X instead). The same goes for HPC and AI deployments in standard PCIe-slot servers without OAM sled support. The Radeon R9 285 suits buyers comparing AMD's official reference specifications and researching a chip before choosing a board-partner card, though it is not the pick for overclocking-focused enthusiasts (reference clocks only). It is not the one for buyers wanting a specific retail card with cooler and warranty details. Our rating of the Instinct MI210 (7.3/10): A practical, PCIe-slot-friendly way to get CDNA 2 compute into a standard server, useful for smaller HPC and AI deployments, but clearly the entry point of its generation next to the dual-die MI250X and now well behind the MI300 series.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Instinct MI210 and Radeon R9 285 differ on board partner?

Yes. Board Partner reads AMD Reference on the Instinct MI210 versus AMD on the Radeon R9 285.

Is the GPU Brand the same on the Instinct MI210 and Radeon R9 285?

It is. Both are listed at AMD, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • GPU Brand

    AMD Instinct MI210
    AMD
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    AMD
  • Series

    AMD Instinct MI210
    Instinct MI200
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    Legacy
  • Board Partner

    AMD Instinct MI210
    AMD Reference (PCIe dual-slot card, data center/OEM only)
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    AMD (Reference)
  • Memory Type

    AMD Instinct MI210
    HBM2E
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    GDDR5Best
  • Ray Tracing Support

    AMD Instinct MI210
    No
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    No
  • TDP

    AMD Instinct MI210
    300 W-58%
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    190 WBest
  • Architecture

    AMD Instinct MI210
    CDNA 2 (single Graphics Compute Die)
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    GCN
  • Process Node

    AMD Instinct MI210
    TSMC 6nm
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    Other
  • Card Length

    AMD Instinct MI210
    267 mm-21%
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    221 mmBest
  • Slot Width

    AMD Instinct MI210
    2
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    2
  • Memory Bus Width

    AMD Instinct MI210
    4096 bitBest
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    256 bit-94%
  • Memory Bandwidth

    AMD Instinct MI210
    1600 GB/sBest
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    176 GB/s-89%
  • PCIe Generation

    AMD Instinct MI210
    PCIe 4.0 x16
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    PCIe 3.0
  • Launch Date

    AMD Instinct MI210
    2022-03
    AMD Radeon R9 285
    September 2014

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose AMD Instinct MI210 if you want the lower slot width (2 vs 2), the higher memory bus width (4096 bit vs 256 bit) and the higher memory bandwidth (1600 GB/s vs 176 GB/s).

    Choose AMD Radeon R9 285 if you want the lower TDP (190 W vs 300 W) and the lower card length (221 mm vs 267 mm).

    Price comparison

    RetailerAMD Instinct MI210AMD Radeon R9 285
    Consumercarts listing

    $249.00

    View on Consumercarts listing

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    AMD Instinct MI210

    7.3 / 10 Expert Rating

    A practical, PCIe-slot-friendly way to get CDNA 2 compute into a standard server, useful for smaller HPC and AI deployments, but clearly the entry point of its generation next to the dual-die MI250X and now well behind the MI300 series.

    More comparisons in Graphics Cards