Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer Nitro VG272U vs ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP: Comparison

Acer Nitro VG272U vs ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP refresh rate compared

Refresh rate is where these two genuinely part company, Acer Nitro VG272U 180 Hz against ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP 60 Hz, a 67% lead for Acer Nitro VG272U. Add screen size to that, 27 in on the Acer Nitro VG272U versus 15.6 in on the ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP, and the pattern holds. There is a split on color gamut as well, ~90% DCI-P3 on the Acer Nitro VG272U versus 100% sRGB on the ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP.

Which should you buy, Acer Nitro VG272U or ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP?

Buy the Acer Nitro VG272U for budget-conscious gamers wanting high refresh QHD and first upgrade from 1080p/60Hz displays, though it is the wrong buy for buyers wanting full stand ergonomics and HDR content viewers. The ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP suits content creators needing a tripod-mountable secondary display and ASUS loyalists who want extra flexibility over the base ZenScreen, though it is not the pick for gamers or anyone latency-sensitive who'll just use it wired anyway and iPhone users, since Miracast doesn't work with iOS. It is equally the pick for presenters who want to cast from a phone or laptop wirelessly. Our rating of the Acer Nitro VG272U (7.5/10): A genuinely fast budget QHD gaming monitor that sacrifices ergonomics and HDR to hit an aggressive price point. Our rating of the ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP (7.1/10): A solid pick if wireless mirroring or tripod mounting actually matters to your workflow, otherwise the plain MB16AC is the better value.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Acer Nitro VG272U and ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP differ on resolution?

Yes. Resolution reads 2560 x 1440 on the Acer Nitro VG272U versus 1920 x 1080 on the ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP.

Is the Panel Type the same on the Acer Nitro VG272U and ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP?

It is. Both are listed at IPS, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Panel Type

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    IPS
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    IPS
  • Brand

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    Acer
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    ASUS
  • Model Number

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    VG272U Mbmiipx
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    MB16AWP
  • Screen Size

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    27 inBest
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    15.6 in-42%
  • Resolution

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    2560 x 1440 (QHD)
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
  • Aspect Ratio

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    16:9
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    16:9
  • Refresh Rate

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    180 HzBest
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    60 Hz-67%
  • Response Time

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    1ms (VRB)Best
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    5 ms
  • Adaptive Sync

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    AMD FreeSync Premium
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    None
  • Series

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    Nitro VG272U
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
  • Color Gamut

    Acer Nitro VG272U
    ~90% DCI-P3
    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    100% sRGB

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer Nitro VG272U if you want the higher screen size (27 in vs 15.6 in), the higher refresh rate (180 Hz vs 60 Hz) and the lower response time (1ms (VRB) vs 5 ms).

    Choose ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer Nitro VG272UASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Acer Nitro VG272U

    7.5 / 10 Expert Rating

    A genuinely fast budget QHD gaming monitor that sacrifices ergonomics and HDR to hit an aggressive price point.

    ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP

    7.1 / 10 Expert Rating

    A solid pick if wireless mirroring or tripod mounting actually matters to your workflow, otherwise the plain MB16AC is the better value.

    More comparisons in Monitors