Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A: Comparison

Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A: the refresh rate difference

The gap that matters here is refresh rate: Acer Nitro XV320QU 170 Hz against ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A 180 Hz, which puts ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A 6% ahead. Add screen size to that, 32 in on the Acer Nitro XV320QU versus 27 in on the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A, and the pattern holds.

Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A: which one fits your build

The Acer Nitro XV320QU is the one to take for Dual-PC users wanting a built-in KVM switch and casual to mid-level gamers upgrading from 1080p, though it is not built for pixel-density purists wanting maximum sharpness at 1440p and competitive players wanting sub-1ms OLED-class response. It also earns its place with buyers wanting a larger 1440p canvas without a 4K price tag. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A suits FPS players wanting strobing and VRR simultaneously and budget-conscious gamers who still want decent color, though it is not the pick for OLED loyalists wanting perfect blacks and 4K desktop users. Our rating of the Acer Nitro XV320QU (7.8/10): A practical, larger-format value gaming monitor whose built-in KVM switch adds real convenience for dual-PC users. Our rating of the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A (8/10): A well-rounded value 1440p gaming monitor whose ELMB Sync feature outperforms its price point.

Where the two are identical

The common ground is wider than the gap: resolution, panel type, hdr formats and aspect ratio are identical here.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Acer Nitro XV320QU and ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A differ on response time?

Yes. Response Time reads 1ms on the Acer Nitro XV320QU versus 1 ms on the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Panel Type

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    IPS
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    IPS
  • Brand

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    Acer
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    ASUS
  • Model Number

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    XV320QU
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    VG27AQL3A
  • Screen Size

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    32 inBest
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    27 in-16%
  • Resolution

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    2560 x 1440 (QHD)
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    2560 x 1440 (QHD)
  • Aspect Ratio

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    16:9
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    16:9
  • Refresh Rate

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    170 Hz-6%
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    180 HzBest
  • Response Time

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    1ms (VRB)
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    1 ms
  • Adaptive Sync

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync Compatible
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    Adaptive-Sync, AMD FreeSync, G-Sync Compatible
  • Series

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    Nitro
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    TUF Gaming
  • Color Gamut

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    ~95%+ DCI-P3
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    130% sRGB, 96% DCI-P3
  • HDR Formats

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    HDR10
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    HDR10
  • Ports

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    DisplayPort 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.0, built-in KVM switch
    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    DisplayPort 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.0, 2x USB-A hub

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer Nitro XV320QU if you want the higher screen size (32 in vs 27 in).

    Choose ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A if you want the higher refresh rate (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer Nitro XV320QUASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A
    AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Acer Nitro XV320QU

    7.8 / 10 Expert Rating

    A practical, larger-format value gaming monitor whose built-in KVM switch adds real convenience for dual-PC users.

    ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL3A

    8 / 10 Expert Rating

    A well-rounded value 1440p gaming monitor whose ELMB Sync feature outperforms its price point.

    More comparisons in Monitors