Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP: Comparison
Acer Nitro XV320QU and ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP separate most on refresh rate: Acer Nitro XV320QU at 170 Hz, ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP at 60 Hz, 65% in favour of Acer Nitro XV320QU. They match on panel type and aspect ratio.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Brand | Acer | ASUS |
| Model Number | XV320QU | MB16AWP |
| Screen Size | 32 | 15.6 in-51% |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 170 Hz | 60 Hz-65% |
| Response Time | 1ms (VRB) | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync Compatible | None |
| Series | Nitro | ZenScreen Go MB16AWP |
| Color Gamut | ~95%+ DCI-P3 | 100% sRGB |
Verdict
Acer Nitro XV320QU
7.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A practical, larger-format value gaming monitor whose built-in KVM switch adds real convenience for dual-PC users.
ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP
7.1 / 10 Expert Rating
A solid pick if wireless mirroring or tripod mounting actually matters to your workflow, otherwise the plain MB16AC is the better value.




