Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38: Comparison
What is the difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38?
On cas latency the spread is 73%, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38 38, so ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ takes it. Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38 also leads on peak bandwidth, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 105.6 GB/s on the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38. Add true latency to that, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 11.5 ns on the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38, and the pattern holds. There is a split on ddr generation as well, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38. They differ on module count too, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38. There is a split on form factor as well, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38. Platform optimisation is not the same on both, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Intel on the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38.
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38: which one fits your build
Buy the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38 for builds that want RGB lighting, though it is not the pick for manual timing tuning: memory chips are not disclosed and adding a second kit later for four sticks.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, capacity per module included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- 8.0/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- Vengeance RGB
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- 38-73%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- Intel
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-20%
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- 11.5 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-76%
- Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38
- 105.6 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 38) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6600C38 if you want the lower true latency (11.5 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (105.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).