Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30: Comparison
What is the difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30?
Capacity per module is where these two genuinely part company, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 16 GB against Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30 32 GB, a 50% lead for Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30. Cas latency runs the same way, 22 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 30 on the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30, another win for ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. Add true latency to that, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30, and the pattern holds. Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30 also leads on peak bandwidth, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 96.0 GB/s on the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30. There is a split on ddr generation as well, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30. They differ on module count too, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30. They differ on ram segment too, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30. Form factor is not the same on both, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30. They differ on platform optimisation too, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus AM5 on the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30.
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30: which one fits your build
Buy the Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30 for AM5 builds that want the 6000MT/s 1:1 sweet spot, though it is the wrong buy for manual timing tuning: memory chips are not disclosed and adding a second kit later for four sticks.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- 8.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- 30-36%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- AM5
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB-50%
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- 32 GBBest
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-73%
- Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30
- 96.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 30).
Choose Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30 if you want the higher capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB), the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (96.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ | Corsair CMH64GX5M2N6000C30 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.