Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB: Comparison
What is the difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB?
On cas latency the spread is 64%, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB 36, so ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ takes it. Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB also leads on peak bandwidth, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 96.0 GB/s on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB. Add true latency to that, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 12.0 ns on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB, and the pattern holds. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB. Module count is not the same on both, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB. They differ on ram segment too, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB. They differ on form factor too, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB. There is a split on platform optimisation as well, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Intel on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB.
Which should you buy, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB?
Buy the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB for clean builds without RGB, though it is the wrong buy for AMD buyers who want an EXPO-validated kit: XMP 3.0 only and manual timing tuning: memory chips are not disclosed. It also earns its place with AM5 or Intel builds that want 6000MT/s for less than a CL30 kit. It is not the one for latency-focused builds: 69% of desktop DDR5 kits are as tight or tighter.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, capacity per module included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- 7.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- CMK32GX5M2E6000C36
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- 36-64%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- Intel
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-15%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- 12.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-73%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB
- 96.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 36) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB if you want the lower true latency (12.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (96.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ | Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6000C36 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.




