Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB: Comparison

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB: the cas latency difference

Cas latency is where these two genuinely part company, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB 32, a 45% lead for ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. True latency runs the same way, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.3 ns on the Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB, another win for Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 99.2 GB/s on the Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB, and the pattern holds. Ddr generation is not the same on both, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB. Module count is not the same on both, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 4 on the Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB. There is a split on form factor as well, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB. They differ on platform optimisation too, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus AM5 on the Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB.

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB: which one fits your build

The Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB suits workstation builds needing 64GB across all 4 DIMM slots and content creators and VM users who need high total capacity, though it is not built for overclockers wanting maximum headroom (quad-DIMM kits clock less reliably). It is not the one for buyers who could get 64GB from an easier-to-tune 2-module kit instead.

What ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB have in common

Everything else lines up. Capacity per module read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    –
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    8.3/10

    DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.

  • DDR Generation

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DDR4
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    DDR5
  • Brand

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    Corsair
  • Part Number

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    CMT64GX5M4B6200C32
  • CAS Latency

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    22Best
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    32-45%
  • Module Count

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    4
  • RAM Segment

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Industrial/Embedded
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    Desktop DDR5
  • Form Factor

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DIMM
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    Desktop DIMM
  • Platform Optimisation

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    JEDEC Only
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    AM5
  • Capacity Per Module

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GB
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    16 GB
  • True Latency

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    13.8 ns-34%
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    10.3 nsBest
  • Peak Bandwidth

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    25.6 GB/s-74%
    Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB
    99.2 GB/sBest

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 32) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).

    Choose Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6200C32 64GB if you want the lower true latency (10.3 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (99.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).