Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ASUS Tinker Board 2 vs Sipeed LicheePi 4A: Comparison
ASUS Tinker Board 2 vs Sipeed LicheePi 4A memory compared
The gap that matters here is memory: ASUS Tinker Board 2 4 GB against Sipeed LicheePi 4A 16 GB, which puts Sipeed LicheePi 4A 75% ahead. Wireless is not the same on both, WiFi 5 on the ASUS Tinker Board 2 versus WiFi 6 on the Sipeed LicheePi 4A. They differ on use case too, General Purpose on the ASUS Tinker Board 2 versus AI / Machine Learning on the Sipeed LicheePi 4A.
Who each one is for
Buy the ASUS Tinker Board 2 for kiosk, digital signage, and point-of-sale deployments and small-batch industrial integrators needing supply guarantees, though it is not built for budget-conscious hobbyists (Radxa ROCK Pi 4C Plus is cheaper) and anyone needing the largest possible community/tutorial base. The Sipeed LicheePi 4A is the one to take for developers exploring RISC-V AI/NPU toolchains early and RAM-hungry RISC-V projects (up to 16GB), though it is not the pick for production AI deployments needing mature tooling and buyers wanting the broadest available software support. Our rating of the ASUS Tinker Board 2 (6.8/10): A capable but pricier RK3399 board whose real selling point is ASUS's industrial supply-chain guarantees rather than anything hobbyists specifically need. Our rating of the Sipeed LicheePi 4A (6.9/10): the most ambitious RISC-V AI board available today, but its software stack is still catching up to what its hardware promises -- best suited to developers who want to be early rather than comfortable.
Which is cheaper, ASUS Tinker Board 2 or Sipeed LicheePi 4A?
Cost splits them too. Sipeed LicheePi 4A sits at $99.00, ASUS Tinker Board 2 at $110, 11% more.
Frequently asked questions
Do the ASUS Tinker Board 2 and Sipeed LicheePi 4A differ on cpu architecture?
Yes. CPU Architecture reads ARM on the ASUS Tinker Board 2 versus RISC-V on the Sipeed LicheePi 4A.
Is the GPIO Header the same on the ASUS Tinker Board 2 and Sipeed LicheePi 4A?
It is. Both are listed at Yes, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- ASUS
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- Sipeed
CPU Architecture
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- ARM
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- RISC-V
Model Number
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- Tinker Board 2
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- LicheePi 4A
Memory
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- 4 GB-75%
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- 16 GBBest
Storage Type
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- eMMC
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- NVMe/M.2
SoC Model
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- Rockchip RK3399, Dual Cortex-A72 @ 2.0GHz + Quad Cortex-A53 @ 1.5GHz
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- Alibaba T-Head TH1520, Quad-Core RISC-V C910 @ 1.85GHz
Has AI Accelerator / NPU
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- No
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- Yes
Wireless
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- WiFi 5
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- WiFi 6
GPIO Header
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- Yes
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- Yes
Price
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- 110 USD
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- 99 USD
Use Case
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- General Purpose
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- AI / Machine Learning
GPU Model
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- Mali-T860MP4
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- Imagination BXE-4-32 MC1
Power Input
- ASUS Tinker Board 2
- 5V/3A USB-C
- Sipeed LicheePi 4A
- 5V/3A USB-C (PD)
Which one should you pick?
Choose ASUS Tinker Board 2 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Choose Sipeed LicheePi 4A if you want the higher memory (16 GB vs 4 GB).
Price comparison
| Retailer | ASUS Tinker Board 2 | Sipeed LicheePi 4A |
|---|---|---|
| Consumercarts listing | $110.00 View on Consumercarts listing | $99.00 View on Consumercarts listing |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
ASUS Tinker Board 2
6.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A capable but pricier RK3399 board whose real selling point is ASUS's industrial supply-chain guarantees rather than anything hobbyists specifically need.
Sipeed LicheePi 4A
6.9 / 10 Expert Rating
The most ambitious RISC-V AI board available today, but its software stack is still catching up to what its hardware promises -- best suited to developers who want to be early rather than comfortable.