Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA200 vs Crucial BX500: Comparison

Acer FA200 vs Crucial BX500: the sequential read difference

Start with sequential read, because it is the widest measured gap between them: Acer FA200 7200 MB/s against Crucial BX500 540 MB/s, 93% in favour of Acer FA200. Add sequential write to that, 6200 MB/s on the Acer FA200 versus 500 MB/s on the Crucial BX500, and the pattern holds. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Acer FA200 versus SATA III on the Crucial BX500. There is a split on nand type as well, QLC on the Acer FA200 versus TLC/QLC , DRAM-Less on the Crucial BX500. They differ on form factor too, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA200 versus 2.5-inch on the Crucial BX500. Warranty is closer, 5 Years on the Acer FA200 versus 3 Years on the Crucial BX500.

Acer FA200 vs Crucial BX500: which one fits your build

Take the Acer FA200 for gamers and general users wanting 2000 GB of PCIe 4.0 storage at high read speeds. It is equally the pick for buyers who value a 5 year warranty and a 1000 TBW rating. Avoid it for workloads with constant heavy writing, since the NAND is QLC and the drive has no DRAM. Buy the Crucial BX500 for basic hard-drive-to-SSD upgrades and budget office PCs, though it is not the pick for heavy multitasking or gaming rigs and buyers wanting the MX500's DRAM cache. Our rating of the Crucial BX500 (6.8/10): A rock-bottom budget SATA drive; the DRAM-less design keeps costs low but limits sustained performance.

What Acer FA200 and Crucial BX500 have in common

Everything else lines up. Drive type read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA200
    6.6/10
    Crucial BX500
    –

    Internal and portable SSDs are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly.

  • Brand

    Acer FA200
    Acer
    Crucial BX500
    Crucial (Micron)
  • Model Number

    Acer FA200
    Acer FA200
    Crucial BX500
    BX500
  • Series

    Acer FA200
    FA200
    Crucial BX500
    BX500
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA200
    Internal
    Crucial BX500
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA200
    PCIe 4.0 x4
    Crucial BX500
    SATA III (6Gb/s)
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA200
    M.2 2280
    Crucial BX500
    2.5-inch
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA200
    7200 MB/s
    Crucial BX500
    540 MB/s-92%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA200
    6200 MB/s
    Crucial BX500
    500 MB/s-92%
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA200
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Crucial BX500
    DRAM-less
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA200
    QLC
    Crucial BX500
    TLC/QLC (Varies by Capacity), DRAM-Less
  • Warranty

    Acer FA200
    5 YearsBest
    Crucial BX500
    3 Years

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher sequential read (7200 MB/s vs 540 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6200 MB/s vs 500 MB/s).

    Choose Crucial BX500 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA200Crucial BX500
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Crucial BX500

    6.8 / 10 Expert Rating

    A rock-bottom budget SATA drive; the DRAM-less design keeps costs low but limits sustained performance.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA200 with