Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA300 vs Acer Predator GM7000: Comparison

FA300 vs Predator GM7000 sequential read compared

On sequential read the spread is 33%, FA300 11000 MB/s against Predator GM7000 7400 MB/s, so FA300 takes it. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the FA300 returns 8.5 against 8.4, a 1% lead. FA300 also leads on sequential write, 10000 MB/s on the FA300 versus 6700 MB/s on the Predator GM7000. Add nand layers to that, 218 on the FA300 versus 96 on the Predator GM7000, and the pattern holds. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the FA300 versus PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Predator GM7000. Dram cache is not the same on both, DRAM-less on the FA300 versus DRAM on the Predator GM7000. They differ on controller too, SM2504XT on the FA300 versus IG5236 on the Predator GM7000. They differ on controller vendor too, Silicon Motion on the FA300 versus InnoGrit on the Predator GM7000. There is a split on nand vendor as well, Kioxia on the FA300 versus Micron on the Predator GM7000.

Where the two are identical

Where they agree, they agree completely, capacity, nand type, form factor and drive type included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA300
    8.5/10Best
    Acer Predator GM7000
    8.4/10-1%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA300
    Acer
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Acer
  • Model Number

    Acer FA300
    Acer FA300
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B27B)
  • Series

    Acer FA300
    FA300
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Predator GM7000
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA300
    Internal
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA300
    PCIe 5.0 x4
    Acer Predator GM7000
    PCIe 4.0 x4
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA300
    M.2 2280
    Acer Predator GM7000
    M.2 2280
  • Capacity

    Acer FA300
    2000 GB
    Acer Predator GM7000
    2000 GB
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA300
    11000 MB/s
    Acer Predator GM7000
    7400 MB/s-33%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA300
    10000 MB/s
    Acer Predator GM7000
    6700 MB/s-33%
  • Controller

    Acer FA300
    SM2504XT
    Acer Predator GM7000
    IG5236
  • Controller Vendor

    Acer FA300
    Silicon Motion
    Acer Predator GM7000
    InnoGrit
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA300
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Acer Predator GM7000
    DRAM
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA300
    TLC
    Acer Predator GM7000
    TLC
  • NAND Vendor

    Acer FA300
    Kioxia
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Micron
  • NAND Layers

    Acer FA300
    218
    Acer Predator GM7000
    96-56%

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher speed score (8.5 vs 8.4), the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB) and the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 7400 MB/s).

    Choose Acer Predator GM7000 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA300Acer Predator GM7000
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA300 with