Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA300 vs Acer Predator GM7000: Comparison

FA300 vs Predator GM7000: the sequential read difference

The gap that matters here is sequential read: FA300 11000 MB/s against Predator GM7000 7400 MB/s, which puts FA300 33% ahead. Speed Score backs the spec sheet up. FA300 scores 8.5 to 8.4, 1% clear. Add sequential write to that, 10000 MB/s on the FA300 versus 6700 MB/s on the Predator GM7000, and the pattern holds. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the FA300 versus PCIe 4.0 x4 on the Predator GM7000. There is a split on dram cache as well, DRAM-less on the FA300 versus DRAM on the Predator GM7000. Nand layers runs the same way, 218 on the FA300 versus 176 on the Predator GM7000, another win for FA300. They differ on controller too, SM2504XT on the FA300 versus IG5236 on the Predator GM7000. There is a split on controller vendor as well, Silicon Motion on the FA300 versus InnoGrit on the Predator GM7000. Nand vendor is not the same on both, Kioxia on the FA300 versus Micron on the Predator GM7000.

Which should you buy, FA300 or Predator GM7000?

Take the Predator GM7000 for gaming PCs and laptops with a PCIe 4.0 M.2 slot wanting 2000 GB of fast storage. It is equally the pick for buyers who want a DRAM cache and a 1300 TBW endurance rating. Avoid it for systems limited to PCIe 3.0, where the drive cannot reach its 7400 MB/s read speed.

Where the two are identical

Where they agree, they agree completely, capacity, nand type, form factor and drive type included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA300
    8.5/10Best
    Acer Predator GM7000
    8.4/10-1%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA300
    Acer
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Acer
  • Model Number

    Acer FA300
    Acer FA300
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B47R)
  • Series

    Acer FA300
    FA300
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Predator GM7000
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA300
    Internal
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA300
    PCIe 5.0 x4
    Acer Predator GM7000
    PCIe 4.0 x4
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA300
    M.2 2280
    Acer Predator GM7000
    M.2 2280
  • Capacity

    Acer FA300
    2000 GB
    Acer Predator GM7000
    2000 GB
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA300
    11000 MB/s
    Acer Predator GM7000
    7400 MB/s-33%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA300
    10000 MB/s
    Acer Predator GM7000
    6700 MB/s-33%
  • Controller

    Acer FA300
    SM2504XT
    Acer Predator GM7000
    IG5236
  • Controller Vendor

    Acer FA300
    Silicon Motion
    Acer Predator GM7000
    InnoGrit
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA300
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Acer Predator GM7000
    DRAM
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA300
    TLC
    Acer Predator GM7000
    TLC
  • NAND Vendor

    Acer FA300
    Kioxia
    Acer Predator GM7000
    Micron
  • NAND Layers

    Acer FA300
    218
    Acer Predator GM7000
    176-19%

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher speed score (8.5 vs 8.4), the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB) and the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 7400 MB/s).

    Choose Acer Predator GM7000 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA300Acer Predator GM7000
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA300 with