Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA300 vs Anacomda i3: Comparison

Acer FA300 vs Anacomda i3: the sequential write difference

The gap that matters here is sequential write: Acer FA300 10000 MB/s against Anacomda i3 2000 MB/s, which puts Acer FA300 80% ahead. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Acer FA300 returns 8.5 against 6.1, a 28% lead. Add sequential read to that, 11000 MB/s on the Acer FA300 versus 3000 MB/s on the Anacomda i3, and the pattern holds. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus PCIe 3.0 x4 on the Anacomda i3. They differ on dram cache too, DRAM-less on the Acer FA300 versus DRAM-less with HMB on the Anacomda i3. Add nand layers to that, 218 on the Acer FA300 versus 176 on the Anacomda i3, and the pattern holds. Controller is not the same on both, SM2504XT on the Acer FA300 versus MAP1202A-F1C on the Anacomda i3. They differ on controller vendor too, Silicon Motion on the Acer FA300 versus Maxio on the Anacomda i3. There is a split on nand vendor as well, Kioxia on the Acer FA300 versus SK hynix on the Anacomda i3.

Where the two are identical

Everything else lines up. Capacity, nand type, form factor and drive type read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA300
    8.5/10Best
    Anacomda i3
    6.1/10-28%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA300
    Acer
    Anacomda i3
    Anacomda
  • Model Number

    Acer FA300
    Acer FA300
    Anacomda i3
    Anacomda i3 (MAP1202 + SK Hynix V7 512Gb)
  • Series

    Acer FA300
    FA300
    Anacomda i3
    i3
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA300
    Internal
    Anacomda i3
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA300
    PCIe 5.0 x4
    Anacomda i3
    PCIe 3.0 x4
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA300
    M.2 2280
    Anacomda i3
    M.2 2280
  • Capacity

    Acer FA300
    2000 GB
    Anacomda i3
    2000 GB
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA300
    11000 MB/s
    Anacomda i3
    3000 MB/s-73%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA300
    10000 MB/s
    Anacomda i3
    2000 MB/s-80%
  • Controller

    Acer FA300
    SM2504XT
    Anacomda i3
    MAP1202A-F1C
  • Controller Vendor

    Acer FA300
    Silicon Motion
    Anacomda i3
    Maxio
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA300
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Anacomda i3
    DRAM-less with HMB
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA300
    TLC
    Anacomda i3
    TLC
  • NAND Vendor

    Acer FA300
    Kioxia
    Anacomda i3
    SK hynix
  • NAND Layers

    Acer FA300
    218
    Anacomda i3
    176-19%

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher speed score (8.5 vs 6.1), the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 2000 GB) and the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 3000 MB/s).

    Choose Anacomda i3 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA300Anacomda i3
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Compare Acer FA300 with