Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA300 vs Crucial MX500: Comparison
Acer FA300 vs Crucial MX500 sequential read compared
Start with sequential read, because it is the widest measured gap between them: Acer FA300 11000 MB/s against Crucial MX500 560 MB/s, 95% in favour of Acer FA300. Speed Score backs the spec sheet up. Acer FA300 scores 8.5 to 5.1, 40% clear. Add sequential write to that, 10000 MB/s on the Acer FA300 versus 510 MB/s on the Crucial MX500, and the pattern holds. Add nand layers to that, 218 on the Acer FA300 versus 96 on the Crucial MX500, and the pattern holds. They differ on dram cache too, DRAM-less on the Acer FA300 versus DRAM on the Crucial MX500. Controller is not the same on both, SM2504XT on the Acer FA300 versus Silicon Motion SM2258 on the Crucial MX500. There is a split on nand vendor as well, Kioxia on the Acer FA300 versus Micron on the Crucial MX500.
Acer FA300 vs Crucial MX500: which one fits your build
Take the Crucial MX500 for buyers who find this drive in stock at a genuinely competitive price against the Samsung 870 EVO. Performance-wise, either is a safe, strong choice. It is equally the pick for anyone needing an M.2 SATA form factor specifically for an older laptop's non-NVMe M.2 slot. A genuinely useful format option not every competitor offers. Avoid it for buyers who want maximum long-term availability confidence. Given this drive's phase-out status in various markets, the Samsung 870 EVO, covered elsewhere on this site, currently offers more consistent long-term sourcing.
Frequently asked questions
Do the Acer FA300 and Crucial MX500 differ on bus interface?
Yes. Bus Interface reads PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus SATA III, 2.5-Inch and M.2 Form Factors Available on the Crucial MX500.
Is the Drive Type the same on the Acer FA300 and Crucial MX500?
It is. Both are listed at Internal, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA300
- 8.5/10Best
- Crucial MX500
- 5.1/10-40%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA300
- Acer
- Crucial MX500
- Crucial (Micron)
Model Number
- Acer FA300
- Acer FA300
- Crucial MX500
- MX500
Series
- Acer FA300
- FA300
- Crucial MX500
- Crucial MX500
Drive Type
- Acer FA300
- Internal
- Crucial MX500
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA300
- PCIe 5.0 x4
- Crucial MX500
- SATA III, 2.5-Inch and M.2 Form Factors Available
Sequential Read
- Acer FA300
- 11000 MB/s
- Crucial MX500
- 560 MB/s-95%
Sequential Write
- Acer FA300
- 10000 MB/s
- Crucial MX500
- 510 MB/s-95%
Controller
- Acer FA300
- SM2504XT
- Crucial MX500
- Silicon Motion SM2258
Controller Vendor
- Acer FA300
- Silicon Motion
- Crucial MX500
- Silicon Motion
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA300
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Crucial MX500
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA300
- TLC
- Crucial MX500
- TLC with DRAM Cache
NAND Vendor
- Acer FA300
- Kioxia
- Crucial MX500
- Micron
NAND Layers
- Acer FA300
- 218
- Crucial MX500
- 96-56%
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher speed score (8.5 vs 5.1), the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 560 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (10000 MB/s vs 510 MB/s).
Choose Crucial MX500 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA300 | Crucial MX500 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.