Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA300 vs OWC Envoy Pro FX: Comparison

Acer FA300 vs OWC Envoy Pro FX: the sequential read difference

Start with sequential read, because it is the widest measured gap between them: Acer FA300 11000 MB/s against OWC Envoy Pro FX 2800 MB/s, 75% in favour of Acer FA300. Acer FA300 also leads on sequential write, 10000 MB/s on the Acer FA300 versus 2600 MB/s on the OWC Envoy Pro FX. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus Thunderbolt 3/4, USB-C Fallback on the OWC Envoy Pro FX. Form factor is not the same on both, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA300 versus Portable Enclosure on the OWC Envoy Pro FX. There is a split on drive type as well, Internal on the Acer FA300 versus External Portable on the OWC Envoy Pro FX.

Acer FA300 vs OWC Envoy Pro FX: which one fits your build

Take the OWC Envoy Pro FX for professionals who want Thunderbolt speed with genuine IP67 ruggedness and USB-C fallback flexibility. This combination is rare among Thunderbolt-class drives. It is not the one for buyers without access to a Thunderbolt port who don't need the ruggedness. The OWC Envoy Pro Elektron, covered elsewhere on this site, offers a lower-cost USB-only alternative.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA300
    8.5/10
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    8.5/10

    Internal and portable SSDs are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly.

  • Brand

    Acer FA300
    Acer
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    OWC
  • Model Number

    Acer FA300
    Acer FA300
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    Envoy Pro FX
  • Series

    Acer FA300
    FA300
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    Envoy Pro FX
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA300
    Internal
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    External Portable
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA300
    PCIe 5.0 x4
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    Thunderbolt 3/4, USB-C Fallback
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA300
    M.2 2280
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    Portable Enclosure
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA300
    11000 MB/s
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    2800 MB/s-75%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA300
    10000 MB/s
    OWC Envoy Pro FX
    2600 MB/s-74%

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 2800 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (10000 MB/s vs 2600 MB/s).

    Choose OWC Envoy Pro FX if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA300OWC Envoy Pro FX
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Compare Acer FA300 with