Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA300 vs Samsung 870 EVO: Comparison
Acer FA300 vs Samsung 870 EVO: the sequential read difference
The gap that matters here is sequential read: Acer FA300 11000 MB/s against Samsung 870 EVO 560 MB/s, which puts Acer FA300 95% ahead. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Acer FA300 returns 8.5 against 5.1, a 40% lead. Acer FA300 also leads on sequential write, 10000 MB/s on the Acer FA300 versus 530 MB/s on the Samsung 870 EVO. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus SATA III, 2.5-Inch on the Samsung 870 EVO. There is a split on nand type as well, TLC on the Acer FA300 versus TLC with DRAM Cache on the Samsung 870 EVO. Dram cache is not the same on both, DRAM-less on the Acer FA300 versus DRAM on the Samsung 870 EVO. They differ on form factor too, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA300 versus 2.5-inch on the Samsung 870 EVO.
Who each one is for
Take the Samsung 870 EVO for buyers upgrading an older system that only supports SATA, not NVMe. This is specifically where a SATA drive remains the right, and only, choice. The same goes for anyone who wants the single most reliable, "buy it and forget it" SATA option available. This drive's specific reputation is built on consistency and sustained performance, not being the flashiest choice. It is the wrong buy for anyone building a new system with NVMe support available. Even a budget NVMe drive like the Crucial NV3, covered elsewhere on this site, delivers meaningfully faster real-world performance than any SATA drive can reach.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, drive type included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA300
- 8.5/10Best
- Samsung 870 EVO
- 5.1/10-40%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA300
- Acer
- Samsung 870 EVO
- Samsung
Model Number
- Acer FA300
- Acer FA300
- Samsung 870 EVO
- 870 EVO
Series
- Acer FA300
- FA300
- Samsung 870 EVO
- Samsung 870 EVO
Drive Type
- Acer FA300
- Internal
- Samsung 870 EVO
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA300
- PCIe 5.0 x4
- Samsung 870 EVO
- SATA III, 2.5-Inch
Form Factor
- Acer FA300
- M.2 2280
- Samsung 870 EVO
- 2.5-inch
Sequential Read
- Acer FA300
- 11000 MB/s
- Samsung 870 EVO
- 560 MB/s-95%
Sequential Write
- Acer FA300
- 10000 MB/s
- Samsung 870 EVO
- 530 MB/s-95%
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA300
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Samsung 870 EVO
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA300
- TLC
- Samsung 870 EVO
- TLC with DRAM Cache
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher speed score (8.5 vs 5.1), the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 560 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (10000 MB/s vs 530 MB/s).
Choose Samsung 870 EVO if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA300 | Samsung 870 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.