Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA300 vs Samsung 870 QVO: Comparison
What is the difference between Acer FA300 and Samsung 870 QVO?
The gap that matters here is sequential read: Acer FA300 11000 MB/s against Samsung 870 QVO 560 MB/s, which puts Acer FA300 95% ahead. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Acer FA300 56% ahead, 8.5 against 3.7. Nand layers runs the same way, 218 on the Acer FA300 versus 96 on the Samsung 870 QVO, another win for Acer FA300. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus SATA III on the Samsung 870 QVO. They differ on nand type too, TLC on the Acer FA300 versus QLC on the Samsung 870 QVO. Dram cache is not the same on both, DRAM-less on the Acer FA300 versus DRAM on the Samsung 870 QVO. They differ on form factor too, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA300 versus 2.5-inch on the Samsung 870 QVO. There is a split on controller as well, SM2504XT on the Acer FA300 versus Samsung MKX on the Samsung 870 QVO. Controller vendor is not the same on both, Silicon Motion on the Acer FA300 versus Samsung on the Samsung 870 QVO. Nand vendor is not the same on both, Kioxia on the Acer FA300 versus Samsung on the Samsung 870 QVO.
Who each one is for
The Samsung 870 QVO is the one to take for bulk file storage and budget NAS-adjacent SATA use, though it is not the pick for OS or boot drives with frequent writes and performance-sensitive workloads. Our rating of the Samsung 870 QVO (7.5/10): the best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: drive type are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA300
- 8.5/10Best
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 3.7/10-56%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA300
- Acer
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Samsung
Model Number
- Acer FA300
- Acer FA300
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 870 QVO
Series
- Acer FA300
- FA300
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 870 QVO
Drive Type
- Acer FA300
- Internal
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA300
- PCIe 5.0 x4
- Samsung 870 QVO
- SATA III
Form Factor
- Acer FA300
- M.2 2280
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 2.5-inch
Sequential Read
- Acer FA300
- 11000 MB/s
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 560 MB/s-95%
Controller
- Acer FA300
- SM2504XT
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Samsung MKX
Controller Vendor
- Acer FA300
- Silicon Motion
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Samsung
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA300
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Samsung 870 QVO
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA300
- TLC
- Samsung 870 QVO
- QLC
NAND Vendor
- Acer FA300
- Kioxia
- Samsung 870 QVO
- Samsung
NAND Layers
- Acer FA300
- 218
- Samsung 870 QVO
- 96-56%
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher speed score (8.5 vs 3.7), the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 560 MB/s) and the higher NAND layers (218 vs 96).
Choose Samsung 870 QVO if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA300 | Samsung 870 QVO |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Samsung 870 QVO
7.5 / 10 Expert Rating
The best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.