Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA300 vs Samsung T9: Comparison

Acer FA300 vs Samsung T9: the sequential read difference

Start with sequential read, because it is the widest measured gap between them: Acer FA300 11000 MB/s against Samsung T9 2000 MB/s, 82% in favour of Acer FA300. Samsung T9 also leads on capacity, 2000 GB on the Acer FA300 versus 4000 GB on the Samsung T9. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus USB-C 3.2 Gen 2x2 on the Samsung T9. There is a split on form factor as well, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA300 versus Portable Enclosure on the Samsung T9. They differ on drive type too, Internal on the Acer FA300 versus External Portable on the Samsung T9.

Who each one is for

Take the Samsung T9 for buyers who want the single best all-around portable SSD without a specific niche requirement. This is exactly the positioning independent testing gives this drive. The same goes for anyone who wants strong speed, real durability, and an exceptional warranty in one package. All three genuinely delivered here rather than trading one for another. It is the wrong buy for buyers on the tightest external SSD budget. The Samsung T7 Shield, covered elsewhere on this site, delivers solid performance and even better water/dust resistance at a lower price.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA300
    8.5/10
    Samsung T9
    7.5/10

    Internal and portable SSDs are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly.

  • Brand

    Acer FA300
    Acer
    Samsung T9
    Samsung
  • Model Number

    Acer FA300
    Acer FA300
    Samsung T9
    T9 Portable SSD
  • Series

    Acer FA300
    FA300
    Samsung T9
    Samsung T9
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA300
    Internal
    Samsung T9
    External Portable
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA300
    PCIe 5.0 x4
    Samsung T9
    USB-C 3.2 Gen 2x2
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA300
    M.2 2280
    Samsung T9
    Portable Enclosure
  • Capacity

    Acer FA300
    2000 GB-50%
    Samsung T9
    4000 GBBest
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA300
    11000 MB/s
    Samsung T9
    2000 MB/s-82%

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 2000 MB/s).

    Choose Samsung T9 if you want the higher capacity (4000 GB vs 2000 GB).

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA300Samsung T9
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Compare Acer FA300 with