Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA300 vs SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD: Comparison
Acer FA300 vs SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD: the capacity difference
The gap that matters here is capacity: Acer FA300 2000 GB against SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD 1000 GB, which puts Acer FA300 50% ahead. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD returns 9.8 against 8.5, a 13% lead. Add sequential read to that, 11000 MB/s on the Acer FA300 versus 14900 MB/s on the SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD, and the pattern holds. The sequential write figures are near enough to ignore, 10000 MB/s on the Acer FA300 versus 11000 MB/s on the SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus PCIe NVMe, M.2 on the SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD. There is a split on dram cache as well, DRAM-less on the Acer FA300 versus DRAM on the SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD. Controller is not the same on both, SM2504XT on the Acer FA300 versus Silicon Motion SM2508 on the SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD. They differ on nand vendor too, Kioxia on the Acer FA300 versus SanDisk on the SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD.
Who each one is for
Take the SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD for gamers and creators on a PCIe 5.0 x4 M.2 slot who want up to 14900 MB/s sequential reads. It is equally the pick for heavy file copy work that benefits from 11000 MB/s sequential writes and a DRAM cache. It is the wrong buy for anyone with only a PCIe 3.0 or 4.0 slot, who will not reach the rated PCIe 5.0 speeds.
Where the two are identical
Everything else lines up. Nand type, form factor, drive type, controller vendor and nand layers read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA300
- 8.5/10-13%
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- 9.8/10Best
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA300
- Acer
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- SanDisk
Model Number
- Acer FA300
- Acer FA300
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- Sandisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB
Series
- Acer FA300
- FA300
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- Optimus GX Pro 8100
Drive Type
- Acer FA300
- Internal
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA300
- PCIe 5.0 x4
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- PCIe NVMe, M.2
Form Factor
- Acer FA300
- M.2 2280
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- M.2 2280
Capacity
- Acer FA300
- 2000 GBBest
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- 1000 GB-50%
Sequential Read
- Acer FA300
- 11000 MB/s-26%
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- 14900 MB/s
Sequential Write
- Acer FA300
- 10000 MB/s-9%
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- 11000 MB/s
Controller
- Acer FA300
- SM2504XT
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- Silicon Motion SM2508
Controller Vendor
- Acer FA300
- Silicon Motion
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- Silicon Motion
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA300
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA300
- TLC
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- TLC
NAND Vendor
- Acer FA300
- Kioxia
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- SanDisk
NAND Layers
- Acer FA300
- 218
- SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD
- 218
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher capacity (2000 GB vs 1000 GB) and the higher NAND layers (218 vs 218).
Choose SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 if you want the higher speed score (9.8 vs 8.5), the higher sequential read (14900 MB/s vs 11000 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (11000 MB/s vs 10000 MB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA300 | SanDisk Optimus GX Pro 8100 1TB SSD |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.