Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Predator GM7000 vs Corsair MP600 Core XT: Comparison
Acer Predator GM7000 vs Corsair MP600 Core XT: the sequential read difference
On sequential read the spread is 32%, Acer Predator GM7000 7400 MB/s against Corsair MP600 Core XT 5000 MB/s, so Acer Predator GM7000 takes it. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Acer Predator GM7000 29% ahead, 8.4 against 6. Sequential write runs the same way, 6700 MB/s on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 4400 MB/s on the Corsair MP600 Core XT, another win for Acer Predator GM7000. There is a split on nand type as well, TLC with DRAM Cache on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus QLC, DRAMless with HMB on the Corsair MP600 Core XT. On warranty there is little in it, 5 Years on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 3 Years on the Corsair MP600 Core XT.
Acer Predator GM7000 vs Corsair MP600 Core XT: which one fits your build
Take the Acer Predator GM7000 for gamers already invested in Acer's Predator ecosystem who want a matching-branded storage upgrade. This drive delivers solid PS5-compatible performance under familiar branding. Avoid it for buyers with no particular brand preference seeking the single best price-to-performance ratio. Several similarly specced competitors covered elsewhere on this site are worth comparing on price alone. Take the Corsair MP600 Core XT for buyers who want large storage capacity at a low cost per terabyte for game and media libraries. QLC NAND keeps this drive's pricing competitive at higher capacities. It is not the one for buyers running very large sustained write workloads like video editing raw footage transfers. A TLC-based drive like the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus, covered elsewhere on this site, sustains write performance more consistently.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: capacity options and bus interface are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 8.4/10Best
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 6.0/10-29%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Acer
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- Corsair
Model Number
- Acer Predator GM7000
- GM7000
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- MP600 Core XT
Series
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Predator GM7000
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- MP600 Core XT
Bus Interface
- Acer Predator GM7000
- PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
Sequential Read
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 7400 MB/s
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 5000 MB/s-32%
Sequential Write
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 6700 MB/s
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 4400 MB/s-34%
NAND Type
- Acer Predator GM7000
- TLC with DRAM Cache
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- QLC, DRAMless with HMB
Warranty
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 5 YearsBest
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 3 Years
Capacity Options
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 1TB, 2TB, 4TB
- Corsair MP600 Core XT
- 1TB, 2TB, 4TB
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer Predator GM7000 if you want the higher speed score (8.4 vs 6.0), the higher sequential read (7400 MB/s vs 5000 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6700 MB/s vs 4400 MB/s).
Choose Corsair MP600 Core XT if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer Predator GM7000 | Corsair MP600 Core XT |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Best Buy | View on Best Buy | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg | |
| Corsair Store | View on Corsair Store |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Compare Acer Predator GM7000 with
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B27B)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B47R)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs ADATA XPG Gammix S70 (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,400 MB/s Write/Full-Size Gaming Flagship)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,400 MB/s Write/Established Midrange Gaming Drive)