Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Predator GM7000 vs Crucial MX500: Comparison
What is the difference between Acer Predator GM7000 and Crucial MX500?
On sequential read the spread is 92%, Acer Predator GM7000 7400 MB/s against Crucial MX500 560 MB/s, so Acer Predator GM7000 takes it. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Acer Predator GM7000 39% ahead, 8.4 against 5.1. Add sequential write to that, 6700 MB/s on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 510 MB/s on the Crucial MX500, and the pattern holds. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus SATA III, 2.5-Inch and M.2 Form Factors Available on the Crucial MX500.
Who each one is for
Take the Acer Predator GM7000 for gamers already invested in Acer's Predator ecosystem who want a matching-branded storage upgrade. This drive delivers solid PS5-compatible performance under familiar branding. It is not the one for buyers with no particular brand preference seeking the single best price-to-performance ratio. Several similarly specced competitors covered elsewhere on this site are worth comparing on price alone. Take the Crucial MX500 for buyers who find this drive in stock at a genuinely competitive price against the Samsung 870 EVO. Performance-wise, either is a safe, strong choice. It is equally the pick for anyone needing an M.2 SATA form factor specifically for an older laptop's non-NVMe M.2 slot. A genuinely useful format option not every competitor offers. It is the wrong buy for buyers who want maximum long-term availability confidence. Given this drive's phase-out status in various markets, the Samsung 870 EVO, covered elsewhere on this site, currently offers more consistent long-term sourcing.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: nand type, dram cache, drive type and warranty are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 8.4/10Best
- Crucial MX500
- 5.1/10-39%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Acer
- Crucial MX500
- Crucial (Micron)
Model Number
- Acer Predator GM7000
- GM7000
- Crucial MX500
- MX500
Series
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Predator GM7000
- Crucial MX500
- Crucial MX500
Drive Type
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Internal
- Crucial MX500
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer Predator GM7000
- PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
- Crucial MX500
- SATA III, 2.5-Inch and M.2 Form Factors Available
Sequential Read
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 7400 MB/s
- Crucial MX500
- 560 MB/s-92%
Sequential Write
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 6700 MB/s
- Crucial MX500
- 510 MB/s-92%
DRAM Cache
- Acer Predator GM7000
- DRAM
- Crucial MX500
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer Predator GM7000
- TLC with DRAM Cache
- Crucial MX500
- TLC with DRAM Cache
Warranty
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 5 Years
- Crucial MX500
- 5 Years
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer Predator GM7000 if you want the higher speed score (8.4 vs 5.1), the higher sequential read (7400 MB/s vs 560 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6700 MB/s vs 510 MB/s).
Choose Crucial MX500 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer Predator GM7000 | Crucial MX500 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Best Buy | View on Best Buy | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Compare Acer Predator GM7000 with
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B27B)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B47R)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs ADATA XPG Gammix S70 (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,400 MB/s Write/Full-Size Gaming Flagship)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,400 MB/s Write/Established Midrange Gaming Drive)