Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Predator GM7000 vs OWC Envoy Pro FX: Comparison
Acer Predator GM7000 vs OWC Envoy Pro FX sequential read compared
The gap that matters here is sequential read: Acer Predator GM7000 7400 MB/s against OWC Envoy Pro FX 2800 MB/s, which puts Acer Predator GM7000 62% ahead. Add sequential write to that, 6700 MB/s on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 2600 MB/s on the OWC Envoy Pro FX, and the pattern holds. On capacity options there is little in it, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 480GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB on the OWC Envoy Pro FX. Bus interface is not the same on both, PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus Thunderbolt 3/4, USB-C Fallback on the OWC Envoy Pro FX. There is a split on form factor as well, M.2 2280 on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus Portable Enclosure on the OWC Envoy Pro FX. Drive type is not the same on both, Internal on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus External Portable on the OWC Envoy Pro FX. The warranty figures are near enough to ignore, 5 Years on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 3 Years on the OWC Envoy Pro FX.
Which should you buy, Acer Predator GM7000 or OWC Envoy Pro FX?
Take the Acer Predator GM7000 for gamers already invested in Acer's Predator ecosystem who want a matching-branded storage upgrade. This drive delivers solid PS5-compatible performance under familiar branding. It is not the one for buyers with no particular brand preference seeking the single best price-to-performance ratio. Several similarly specced competitors covered elsewhere on this site are worth comparing on price alone. Take the OWC Envoy Pro FX for professionals who want Thunderbolt speed with genuine IP67 ruggedness and USB-C fallback flexibility. This combination is rare among Thunderbolt-class drives. It is the wrong buy for buyers without access to a Thunderbolt port who don't need the ruggedness. The OWC Envoy Pro Elektron, covered elsewhere on this site, offers a lower-cost USB-only alternative.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 8.4/10
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- 8.5/10
Internal and portable SSDs are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly.
Brand
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Acer
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- OWC
Model Number
- Acer Predator GM7000
- GM7000
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- Envoy Pro FX
Series
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Predator GM7000
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- Envoy Pro FX
Drive Type
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Internal
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- External Portable
Bus Interface
- Acer Predator GM7000
- PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- Thunderbolt 3/4, USB-C Fallback
Form Factor
- Acer Predator GM7000
- M.2 2280
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- Portable Enclosure
Sequential Read
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 7400 MB/s
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- 2800 MB/s-62%
Sequential Write
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 6700 MB/s
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- 2600 MB/s-61%
Warranty
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 5 YearsBest
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- 3 Years
Capacity Options
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 1TB, 2TB, 4TB
- OWC Envoy Pro FX
- 480GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TBBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer Predator GM7000 if you want the higher sequential read (7400 MB/s vs 2800 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6700 MB/s vs 2600 MB/s).
Choose OWC Envoy Pro FX if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer Predator GM7000 | OWC Envoy Pro FX |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Best Buy | View on Best Buy | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Compare Acer Predator GM7000 with
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B27B)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B47R)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs ADATA XPG Gammix S70 (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,400 MB/s Write/Full-Size Gaming Flagship)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,400 MB/s Write/Established Midrange Gaming Drive)