Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer Predator GM7000 vs Samsung 870 EVO: Comparison

Acer Predator GM7000 vs Samsung 870 EVO: the sequential read difference

Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, Acer Predator GM7000 7400 MB/s against Samsung 870 EVO 560 MB/s, a 92% lead for Acer Predator GM7000. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Acer Predator GM7000 returns 8.4 against 5.1, a 39% lead. Acer Predator GM7000 also leads on sequential write, 6700 MB/s on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 530 MB/s on the Samsung 870 EVO.

Who each one is for

Take the Acer Predator GM7000 for gamers already invested in Acer's Predator ecosystem who want a matching-branded storage upgrade. This drive delivers solid PS5-compatible performance under familiar branding. It is not the one for buyers with no particular brand preference seeking the single best price-to-performance ratio. Several similarly specced competitors covered elsewhere on this site are worth comparing on price alone. Take the Samsung 870 EVO for buyers upgrading an older system that only supports SATA, not NVMe. This is specifically where a SATA drive remains the right, and only, choice. It is equally the pick for anyone who wants the single most reliable, "buy it and forget it" SATA option available. This drive's specific reputation is built on consistency and sustained performance, not being the flashiest choice. Avoid it for anyone building a new system with NVMe support available. Even a budget NVMe drive like the Crucial NV3, covered elsewhere on this site, delivers meaningfully faster real-world performance than any SATA drive can reach.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Acer Predator GM7000 and Samsung 870 EVO differ on bus interface?

Yes. Bus Interface reads PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus SATA III, 2.5-Inch on the Samsung 870 EVO.

Is the NAND Type the same on the Acer Predator GM7000 and Samsung 870 EVO?

It is. Both are listed at TLC with DRAM Cache, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer Predator GM7000
    8.4/10Best
    Samsung 870 EVO
    5.1/10-39%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer Predator GM7000
    Acer
    Samsung 870 EVO
    Samsung
  • Model Number

    Acer Predator GM7000
    GM7000
    Samsung 870 EVO
    870 EVO
  • Series

    Acer Predator GM7000
    Predator GM7000
    Samsung 870 EVO
    Samsung 870 EVO
  • Drive Type

    Acer Predator GM7000
    Internal
    Samsung 870 EVO
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer Predator GM7000
    PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
    Samsung 870 EVO
    SATA III, 2.5-Inch
  • Form Factor

    Acer Predator GM7000
    M.2 2280
    Samsung 870 EVO
    2.5-inch
  • Sequential Read

    Acer Predator GM7000
    7400 MB/s
    Samsung 870 EVO
    560 MB/s-92%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer Predator GM7000
    6700 MB/s
    Samsung 870 EVO
    530 MB/s-92%
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer Predator GM7000
    DRAM
    Samsung 870 EVO
    DRAM
  • NAND Type

    Acer Predator GM7000
    TLC with DRAM Cache
    Samsung 870 EVO
    TLC with DRAM Cache
  • Warranty

    Acer Predator GM7000
    5 Years
    Samsung 870 EVO
    5 Years

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer Predator GM7000 if you want the higher speed score (8.4 vs 5.1), the higher sequential read (7400 MB/s vs 560 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (6700 MB/s vs 530 MB/s).

    Choose Samsung 870 EVO if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer Predator GM7000Samsung 870 EVO
    AmazonView on Amazon
    Best BuyView on Best Buy
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Compare Acer Predator GM7000 with