Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer Predator GM7000 vs Samsung 870 QVO: Comparison

Acer Predator GM7000 vs Samsung 870 QVO: the sequential read difference

Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, Acer Predator GM7000 7400 MB/s against Samsung 870 QVO 560 MB/s, a 92% lead for Acer Predator GM7000. Speed Score backs the spec sheet up. Acer Predator GM7000 scores 8.4 to 3.7, 56% clear. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus SATA III on the Samsung 870 QVO. Nand type is not the same on both, TLC with DRAM Cache on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus QLC on the Samsung 870 QVO. They differ on form factor too, M.2 2280 on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 2.5-inch on the Samsung 870 QVO. Console compatibility is not the same on both, PS5 Ready on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus None Stated on the Samsung 870 QVO.

Who each one is for

Take the Acer Predator GM7000 for gamers already invested in Acer's Predator ecosystem who want a matching-branded storage upgrade. This drive delivers solid PS5-compatible performance under familiar branding. Avoid it for buyers with no particular brand preference seeking the single best price-to-performance ratio. Several similarly specced competitors covered elsewhere on this site are worth comparing on price alone. Buy the Samsung 870 QVO for bulk file storage and budget NAS-adjacent SATA use, though it is not built for OS or boot drives with frequent writes and performance-sensitive workloads. Our rating of the Samsung 870 QVO (7.5/10): the best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Acer Predator GM7000 and Samsung 870 QVO differ on capacity options?

Yes. Capacity Options reads 1TB, 2TB, 4TB on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB on the Samsung 870 QVO.

Is the Drive Type the same on the Acer Predator GM7000 and Samsung 870 QVO?

It is. Both are listed at Internal, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Acer Predator GM7000 (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,700 MB/s Write/Gaming-Branded Midrange Drive)
Acer
Acer Predator GM7000
Samsung 870 QVO (SATA III/QLC/Up to 8TB High-Capacity Budget SATA)
Samsung
Samsung 870 QVO

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer Predator GM7000
    8.4/10Best
    Samsung 870 QVO
    3.7/10-56%

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer Predator GM7000
    Acer
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Samsung

  • Model Number

    Acer Predator GM7000
    GM7000
    Samsung 870 QVO
    870 QVO

  • Series

    Acer Predator GM7000
    Predator GM7000
    Samsung 870 QVO
    870 QVO

  • Drive Type

    Acer Predator GM7000
    Internal
    Samsung 870 QVO
    Internal

  • Bus Interface

    Acer Predator GM7000
    PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
    Samsung 870 QVO
    SATA III

  • Form Factor

    Acer Predator GM7000
    M.2 2280
    Samsung 870 QVO
    2.5-inch

  • Console Compatibility

    Acer Predator GM7000
    PS5 Ready
    Samsung 870 QVO
    None Stated

  • Sequential Read

    Acer Predator GM7000
    7400 MB/s
    Samsung 870 QVO
    560 MB/s-92%

  • DRAM Cache

    Acer Predator GM7000
    DRAM
    Samsung 870 QVO
    DRAM

  • NAND Type

    Acer Predator GM7000
    TLC with DRAM Cache
    Samsung 870 QVO
    QLC

  • Warranty

    Acer Predator GM7000
    5 YearsBest
    Samsung 870 QVO
    3 Years

  • Capacity Options

    Acer Predator GM7000
    1TB, 2TB, 4TB
    Samsung 870 QVO
    1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer Predator GM7000 if you want the higher speed score (8.4 vs 3.7) and the higher sequential read (7400 MB/s vs 560 MB/s).

    Choose Samsung 870 QVO if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer Predator GM7000Samsung 870 QVO
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    Best BuyView on Best Buy
    NeweggView on NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Samsung 870 QVO

    7.5 / 10 Expert Rating

    The best pick for cheap, high-capacity SATA storage, though QLC NAND limits sustained write performance.

    Compare Acer Predator GM7000 with