Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Predator GM7000 vs Samsung 970 PRO: Comparison
What is the difference between Acer Predator GM7000 and Samsung 970 PRO?
Sequential read is where these two genuinely part company, Acer Predator GM7000 7400 MB/s against Samsung 970 PRO 3500 MB/s, a 53% lead for Acer Predator GM7000. The benchmark result agrees. Speed Score puts Acer Predator GM7000 15% ahead, 8.4 against 7.1. There is a split on bus interface as well, PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus PCIe 3.0 x4 on the Samsung 970 PRO. There is a split on nand type as well, TLC with DRAM Cache on the Acer Predator GM7000 versus MLC on the Samsung 970 PRO.
Which should you buy, Acer Predator GM7000 or Samsung 970 PRO?
Take the Acer Predator GM7000 for gamers already invested in Acer's Predator ecosystem who want a matching-branded storage upgrade. This drive delivers solid PS5-compatible performance under familiar branding. Avoid it for buyers with no particular brand preference seeking the single best price-to-performance ratio. Several similarly specced competitors covered elsewhere on this site are worth comparing on price alone. The Samsung 970 PRO is the one to take for heavy sustained write workloads and professionals needing long-term drive durability, though it is not the pick for budget shoppers and users wanting PCIe 4.0/5.0 speeds. Our rating of the Samsung 970 PRO (8.3/10): A legacy MLC flagship valued for endurance, though newer TLC drives have long since overtaken it on raw speed.
What Acer Predator GM7000 and Samsung 970 PRO have in common
The common ground is wider than the gap: dram cache, form factor, drive type and warranty are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 8.4/10Best
- Samsung 970 PRO
- 7.1/10-15%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Acer
- Samsung 970 PRO
- Samsung
Model Number
- Acer Predator GM7000
- GM7000
- Samsung 970 PRO
- 970 PRO
Series
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Predator GM7000
- Samsung 970 PRO
- 970 PRO
Drive Type
- Acer Predator GM7000
- Internal
- Samsung 970 PRO
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer Predator GM7000
- PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
- Samsung 970 PRO
- PCIe 3.0 x4
Form Factor
- Acer Predator GM7000
- M.2 2280
- Samsung 970 PRO
- M.2 2280
Sequential Read
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 7400 MB/s
- Samsung 970 PRO
- 3500 MB/s-53%
DRAM Cache
- Acer Predator GM7000
- DRAM
- Samsung 970 PRO
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer Predator GM7000
- TLC with DRAM Cache
- Samsung 970 PRO
- MLC
Warranty
- Acer Predator GM7000
- 5 Years
- Samsung 970 PRO
- 5 Years
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer Predator GM7000 if you want the higher speed score (8.4 vs 7.1) and the higher sequential read (7400 MB/s vs 3500 MB/s).
Choose Samsung 970 PRO if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer Predator GM7000 | Samsung 970 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Best Buy | View on Best Buy | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Samsung 970 PRO
8.3 / 10 Expert Rating
A legacy MLC flagship valued for endurance, though newer TLC drives have long since overtaken it on raw speed.
More comparisons in SSDs
Compare Acer Predator GM7000 with
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B27B)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs Acer Predator GM7000 (IG5236 + Micron B47R)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs ADATA XPG Gammix S70 (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,400 MB/s Write/Full-Size Gaming Flagship)
- Acer Predator GM7000 vs ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade (PCIe 4.0 NVMe/7,400 MB/s Read/6,400 MB/s Write/Established Midrange Gaming Drive)